View more on these topics

Treasury to intervene on mortgage prisoners

George-Osborne-walking-up-steps-700.jpg

The Treasury is investigating how to help hundreds of thousands of mortgage prisoners trapped on their deals following the Mortgage Market Review.

The Chancellor met with Money Saving Expert’s Martin Lewis today on the issue and other industry experts have been raising this with the Treasury.

The so-called ‘transitional arrangements’ written into the MMR allow lenders to waive affordability checks for existing borrowers who may be trapped by the rules as long as the customer does not wish to borrow more money, there is no “material impact” on affordability and they have a good payment history.

Smaller lenders have generally been more willing to use the arrangements but big lenders have come under fire for not applying them, despite being publicly criticised by the FCA.

The MMR allowed lenders to apply the rules to their own customers and customers coming from rivals.

However, the Mortgage Credit Directive, which came into effect in March, dictates that lenders must apply an affordability test on borrowers who switch over from a rival, although borrowers staying with the same lender are not affected.

MoneySavingExpert.com founder Martin Lewis says: “This is now being looked at at the top level. That isn’t a victory in itself but it certainly means that if there is an easy fix then I think there is a chance that it is happening. What we want is for people to have the ability to go to the best place in the market [for the best deal].”

Association of Mortgage Intermediaries chairman Pat Bunton, who has campaigned fiercely on this issue, says: “It is great George Osborne is taking an interest in this. There is a whole bunch of people who have been left stranded by lenders and the excuses now being given around MCD requiring an affordability test on every case is a joke. There is nothing that actually stipulates what that affordability test should be.”

Think-tank The Resolution Foundation estimates one in 10 borrowers could potentially be trapped on their deals, which it says works out at around 770,000 households.

The Treasury confirmed the meeting took place today, but it could not yet reveal the next course of action.

Recommended

Lynda Blackwell FCA

FCA: Firms are increasingly using transitional arrangements

Lenders are increasingly using the transitional arrangements written into the MMR to stop borrowers becoming trapped, says the FCA. The transitional arrangements have been a hot topic of late and lenders have come under fire for their reluctance to use them. They allow lenders to waive affordability checks for borrowers who may be trapped under […]

Mortgage-Regulation-Book-Gavel-700.jpg

Small mutuals use transitional rules to gain from big lenders

Small building societies are using the MMR’s transitional arrangements to mop up business from bigger lenders. Last week, Ipswich and Melton Mowbray building societies publicly stated they were using the transitional arrangements to target borrowers from other lenders, as the rules allow. The FCA introduced the transitional arrangements within the MMR to help borrowers who […]

A funny old year

The past 12 months have been turbulent – just take a look at this chart of the FTSE 100 over the last year. There have been some points which I’m sure would have caused your clients some concern, and possibly even had them looking for an alternative investment with reduced volatility; perhaps without reducing their […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
Comments
  • Post a comment
  • Stuart Duncan 12th May 2016 at 1:46 pm

    It has been shocking how many of the bigger players have ignored the transitional arrangements and quoted Treating Customers Fairly as the reason i.e. “we cannot treat one client differently from another!”

    It is what happens when there are fuzzy sets of rules with no clear priorities laid down and, in fact, no hard and fast rules.

    It has been a serious shortcoming from the FCA and their pre-phoenix entity to make vague rules and expect lenders to adhere to them. The plus side of this has been to allow some wriggle-room but it has too often resulted in lenders acting with excessive caution in order to avoid admonishment or, in the more cynical cases, to simply rip off the consumer or get rid of customers that they do not want on their books.

  • Robert Welsh 12th May 2016 at 12:43 pm

    Wonder if this will also apply to negative equity BTL clients coming to the end of their mortgage (not product) terms?