View more on these topics

TMW restricts B2L criteria after Govt tax changes

Estate-Agent-To-Let-Buy-Sign-700.jpg

The Mortgage Works is upping its buy-to-let rental calculations and cutting its maximum LTV in response to government tax relief changes.

The lender is increasing its rental cover requirements from 125 per cent to 145 per cent and cutting its maximum LTV from 80 per cent to 75 per cent.

The changes come in from 11 May.

A broker note says the changes will “help landlords safeguard positive cash flow, as future tax relief changes begin to phase in from next year (April 2017)”.

The lender says: “These changes have been implemented in response to the forthcoming changes to landlord tax relief, which will start to be phased in from April 2017.

“At present, mortgage interest is fully tax deductible, but from April 2020 tax relief on mortgage interest will be limited to 20 per cent. This means that higher tax rate payers will pay more tax as relief is reduced to the equivalent level of a basic rate tax payer.”

TMW managing director Paul Wootton says: “As a responsible lender, this change is a pro-active move that recognises the need to help safeguard rental cover for landlords over the coming years, and in advance of the forthcoming changes to mortgage interest tax relief.

“TMW, as part of Nationwide, already robustly assesses the affordability of its buy-to-let mortgages against stress rates that are considerably higher than the borrower’s existing rate.

“The increase in the rental cover requirement is designed to strengthen this cashflow position even further, and help them withstand the impact of increased costs from the new tax regime.”

The lender’s maximum lending cap will still be calculated using the higher of either the stress rate or product pay rate.

Recommended

Estate-Agent-To-Let-Buy-Sign-700.jpg
1

B2L sales fell 26% in March: Equifax

Buy-to-let mortgage sales fell 26.2 per cent or £1.04bn in March month-on-month, according to Equifax Touchstone. The firm says this is despite an expected last minute rise ahead of stamp duty rate increases which took effect on 1 April 2016. Equifax says the average value of a residential mortgage in March was £190,091 (2015: £179,187), […]

Estate-Agent-To-Let-Buy-Sign-700.jpg

Brokers predict criteria war as B2L volumes dip

Brokers are predicting a criteria war as Government intervention leads to reduced volumes in the buy-to-let sector. Lenders have revised their buy-to-let offerings over the past week in an effort to drum up business. Accord cut rates by up to 30bps and TSB by up to 35bps. TSB is also slashing residential rates by as […]

Santander-700x450.jpg

Santander to cut B2L rates by up to 30bps

Santander is set to cut selected buy-to-let two-year fixed rates by up to 0.3 per cent. The lender is one of many to cut buy-to-let rates in recent weeks, with experts suggesting there has been a scramble for business since 1 April, when activity slumped after the increased buy-to-let stamp duty rates took effect. From […]

Japan Economic Insight

James Dowey, Chief Economist, and Paul Caruana-Galizia, Economist

The conventional wisdom is that following a roughly 50 per cent rise in the stock market in 2013 in Yen terms, the Japan trade is over and done*. So the story goes, those big gains were due to a one-off boost from quantitative easing (QE) and a depreciation of the Yen — policies that one should think of as a palliative to Japan’s economic weakness, but not a cure. Rather the cure, and by implication the necessary condition for a longer-term investment case, is deep structural reforms — a painstaking re-weaving of Japan’s economic and social fabric, no less. The story continues: this is a much tougher test than launching a blast of QE, and one that prime minister Shinzo Abe, although well intentioned and well supported by the public thus far, is likely to fail. Stick a fork in Japan, it’s done…continue reading

Comments
  • Post a comment
  • Carl McGovern 5th May 2016 at 12:56 pm

    Perhaps a more sensible approach would be to apply this higher rate tax payers only, as basic rate tax payers won’t be affected. Given that higher rate tax payers may have residual Income, this could be taken into consideration too. The danger is as usual that an over reaction is about to start and that won’t be helpful.

  • Alex Ramsay 29th April 2016 at 10:09 am

    More great news for BTL