View more on these topics

Does second charge need product levies and its own trade body?

The second charge market is not yet cohesive enough to present a united front. There is no common message and the marketing is at best fragmented and at worst invisible.

So how does the market generate more second charge business? I believe the answer is two-fold.

Firstly, I believe that the industry needs its own trade body in order for mortgage brokers, packagers and lenders to help shape the future of the second charge marketplace.

To engage and promote the industry we need to listen to the mortgage broker. They are the ones who take what we say to them and then transfer that knowledge to their own clients.

We need to be heard outside of the introverted and, to some extent, self-serving cocoon that currently exists in the industry. To thrive we need to have the mortgage brokers leading this. We need a board of lenders, packagers, brokers and even consumers to help get the second charge market ratified by those who can help it grow.

Secondly, I think we need a product levy. The trade body needs to be seen as not only not for profit but also not for the personal benefit of people who are running it. The best way I feel we can achieve this is via a product levy. If the average run rate is currently 1300 completions per month, why not deduct £50 at source which can then be directed to help grow the industry? This could give the best part of £750,000 as an annual marketing budget.

This board should be entrusted with the money and be used on board approval, and money should only be used to promote the industry they would be no expenses being claimed by anyone on the panel, with the board being altered to allow more people to give their opinion.

One additional idea may be for mortgage brokers to join the body, subject to attending two workshop/masterclasses/events by a packager or lender. We want the broker to drive this as without them we are all going to have to get our CVs updated.

The time continues to be ripe for a change in direction for what is clearly an important product product for a mortgage broker to have in their armoury. There is a demand globally for transparency across many sectors so let’s take ownership of the problem and ensure that the second charge market is seen to be leading from the front.

Scott Thorpe is director of London Money Loans

Recommended

1

Can predicted second charge boom really happen?

The second charge market has not taken off as predicted. If another roll of the dice is to make any difference in 2017, experts think the key will be adviser education For years the second charge mar­ket has been disparaged by main­stream brokers and lenders. A lack of transparency and ques­tionable lending practices in the […]

Payne
1

Comment: Expensive second charge fees need to end

The second charge model has long been built on big back-end fees but that does not wash in today’s market What is a reasonable fee for a £50,000 second charge loan? £200? £500? £1,000? Maybe. What about £5,000 or even more? In a sector the regulator intended to put on a level playing field with […]

Why prevention is better than cure

Quoting the famous adage, prevention is better than cure; there are many proactive benefits that can improve wellness in the workplace, decrease stress, increase staff morale and reduce absenteeism, as well as attracting and retaining employees of a higher standard. With a recent study showing that employees in Britain are working below peak productivity, preventative benefits can ensure you address potential health issues or causes of stress at their source and ensure productivity in the workplace remains at an optimum level. With this in mind, how are you using preventative benefits to help keep your workforce happy and healthy?

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
Comments
  • Post a comment
  • Des Platt 23rd March 2017 at 11:35 am

    Must admit I am seeing a level of desperation in the calls I’m getting from second charge lenders. I think it is right that the option should always be considered and indeed I always did from becoming an independent in 2004. Only one in ten times in my estimation is it the best option