View more on these topics

Plans for FCA to withhold fine discounts delayed in Lords

Parliament-Building-Square-700x450.jpg

New rules that could have allowed the FCA to withhold discounts to firms who settle on fines early, but do not take action to stop misconduct, have been put on hold as the regulator reviews its stance on financial penalties.

An amendment to the Criminal Finances Bill was proposed by Liberal Democrat Peer Lord Sharkey late Tuesday to ensure that firms who received discounts on FCA fines for early settlement followed through with any internal disciplinary proceedings the regulator had requested, or they would not be entitled to a portion of the discount.

Since the FCA was created, firms have saved a total of £1.2bn on fines through early settlement, and are eligible for a discount of up to 30 per cent if they reach an agreement with the regulator early on.

Sharkey said the amendment would help his concerns that the FCA is “under-resourced, underpaid, undervalued and overburdened”.

He said: “It effectively automates, or nearly automates, the process of compliance with settlement conditions. It removes the need for substantive re-investigation by the FCA and, instead, places a burden on the offending firm to demonstrate compliance. It offers a powerful financial incentive for doing so at no additional cost to the FCA or to the taxpayer.”

Sharkey’s amendment was then backed by Labour peer Lord Mendelsohn, who argued it was an “important gap” in the FCA’s process.

Responding to the amendment, Home Office junior minister Baroness Williams of Trafford said that she and other peers had held discussions with the FCA on the matter.

She commended the “ingenuity” of an automatic system, but said that “having consulted with operational partners and Treasury officials, the Government’s view is that the existing regime gives the FCA the flexibility to apply penalties and impose requirements on a case-by-case basis.”

She added that the Government feared fewer firms would settle early with the regulator if their discounts were not guaranteed.

“We are concerned that this amendment would weaken the incentives for firms to settle early with the FCA, given that the settlement would not be final, subject to the full discount being granted. As a result, they might instead choose to engage the FCA in costly and protracted action rather than all being involved in focusing on remedying the underlying issues.

“There might be ways of enhancing the existing regulatory system; the FCA is, in fact, conducting a review of its penalties policy at present, and I know that it would welcome the opportunity to continue this discussion with both noble Lords.”

Sharkey agreed to withdraw the amendment.

Recommended

Home-House-Monopoly-Money-Property-700x450.jpg

‘Don’t stifle interest-only’, market tells FCA

The Financial Conduct Authority has been urged not to stifle fresh interest-only lending as it launched its third review of the sector in five years last week. The regulator unveiled the latest thematic review in its 2017/18 business plan. The report says: “Around 1.8 million UK homeowners currently have outstanding interest-only mortgages (excluding buy-to-let), and […]

FCA logo new 3 620x430

FCA overhauls mortgage arrears after 750,000 ‘unfairly’ overcharged

The Financial Conduct Authority called on lenders to overhaul their arrears processes after finding 750,000 borrowers have been overcharged. The problem sees lenders including consumers’ arrears balance in their monthly mortgage repayments when these are occasionally recalculated. If lenders do not take out the arrears figure when recalculating mortgage payments then consumers effectively pay twice, […]

FCA moots 10% broker fee cut

Mortgage brokers could see their Financial Conduct Authority fees drop by 10.7 per cent under new proposals unveiled today. An FCA levy consultation suggests that firms in the A.18 home finance provider category would pay £16.3m for 2017/18, compared to £18.2m in 2016/17. The consultation closes on 9 June and intermediaries would get bills after […]

Retirement - thumbnail

Defined benefit schemes: Part 2

Justin Corliss, business development manager In defined benefit (DB) schemes part 1, we looked at recent guidance aimed at DB scheme trustees and sponsors. In part 2 we will look at guidance available to pension transfer specialists (PTS). In the first instance, PTS should familiarise themselves with COBS 19. All guidance below is designed to […]

Don’t play chicken with the Bank of Japan

By Josh Ausden, Head of Client Investment Strategy, Neptune Short-term yen strength has hurt the Neptune Japan Opportunities Fund but recent events have only added weight to our conviction that the Bank of Japan will act to ease policy, boosting multinationals’ profits and weakening the yen. In recent weeks the performance of the Japanese stockmarket […]