View more on these topics

NLA: U-turn on BTL tax relief cut ‘categorically’ will not happen

The National Landlords Association says a U-turn on the forthcoming cut to buy-to-let tax relief “is not going to happen” despite landlords petitioning the Government.

Landlords say they have been unfairly targeted by the changes, which restrict the tax relief landlords can claim on property finance costs to the basic rate of income tax.

They have started a petition, which has reached nearly 25,000 signatures, in order to force the Government to consider reversing the changes. Over 100,000 signatures are needed before it can be considered for debate in Parliament.

However, the NLA, a body that represents landlords, says a U-turn will “categorically” not happen.

NLA head of policy Chris Norris says: “Landlords are understandably very worried by this and you only have to run the numbers to see that it could potentially drive people out of the business.

“But [petitions] are quite limited. We are certainly not suggesting people don’t sign the petition, and they can be quite good for raising awareness, but in this case we need to be a bit more targeted and more focused to get things changed.

“As much as we would love to see a U-turn, we are realistic and we have been told categorically that it is not going to happen.”

But Norris says the NLA is lobbying the Government to introduce business asset roll-over relief so that landlords do not end up paying capital gains tax twice if they decide to restructure their portfolios when the change comes in.

He adds: “Almost any other business can sell underperforming assets and reinvest and defer that CGT until they sell the whole business.

“If a landlord has made a gain on their property – which is quite likely – they will pay CGT on the sale and take whatever they have left, but when they come to sell up they will pay again.”

Another trade body, the Residential Landlords Association, has written to the Chancellor asking him to “pause” the proposals while the impact of the change is investigated.

The RLA argues the change “destroys the established business model which has allowed the sector to grow and play a significant role in housing provision” since the Housing Act in 1988.

It says the change will increase rents, dissuade landlords from investing in purchasing properties and lead to lower standards because of reduced investment in repairs.

The letter adds: “We fear this proposal will send out the message of a longer-term intention to end all tax relief on mortgage interest for private landlords”.



Media Spotlight – The Establishment: And How They Get Away With It, by Owen Jones

This is another analysis of the fallout from the economic disaster of 2007-08. However, this week’s book – The Establishment: And How They Get Away With It – does not look at the causes or economic consequences of the crisis but instead examines how the very people who were responsible for the tumult consistently emerged […]


Analysis: Help clients to keep affording insurance

It looks very likely that our customers will have to foot the bill for the almost 59 per cent increase in insurance premium tax announced in the summer Budget. Will this affect the amount of insurance people buy? The AA predicts an average £5 rise in home insurance. That could be enough for some consumers […]

Andy Haldane

Haldane ‘in the frame’ for FCA

Bank of England chief economist Andy Haldane has been tipped as the top candidate to run as head of the Financial Conduct Authority. The FCA is in the process of finding a replacement for Martin Wheatley, who will leave his position later this month.  The Sunday Times reports that Haldane is the frontrunner for the recruitment process, […]


HSBC overhauls B2L mortgage range

HSBC has overhauled its buy-to-let mortgage range and is making the products to non-HSBC customers for the first time. The new range will also see the rental cover requirements reduced from 130 per cent to 125 per cent, and the maximum loan-to-value available on further advances increase from 60 per cent to 75 per cent. […]

China tech and Global Alpha: a new great leap forward

By Robin Geffen, Fund Manager and CEO

Internet giant Alibaba is exactly the type of entrepreneurial company that the high-conviction, top-performing Neptune Global Alpha Fund seeks to invest in. Established just 14 years ago in an apartment in Hangzhou, today Alibaba is larger than Amazon and eBay put together and is challenging some of the most powerful internet companies in the world…

Read more 

Important information

Investment risks

The value of an investment and any income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Forecasts and past performance are not a guide to future performance. Some information and statistical data herein has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable but in no way are warranted by us as to their accuracy or completeness. These are Neptune’s views and as such this document is deemed to be impartial research. We do not undertake to advise you of any change to our views.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
  • Post a comment
  • Shari 30th November 2016 at 5:09 am

    Why NLA does not collect signatures from all the landlords? I have not been asked to sign the petition. I believe NLA works in favour of the Government.

    I believe Conservative Party has changed their policy and by applying these draconian policies are trying to squeeze the hard working landlords out of their assets while they let the rich, companies and corporations hide their assets in trusts off-shore.

    George Osborne’s policy and implementation of this unfair and biased legislation regarding mortgage interest tax relief destroying all those landlords with debt is very left oriented and I’m afraid they have become worse than Labour Party. I will vote at the next election for UKIP. At least, they are far from Labour Party and not politically correct. I think all other landlords will keep away from the Tories too. I was a supporter/active volunteer but not any more.

  • opus appleby 9th September 2015 at 10:39 am

    I bet there is a “petition” their greed knows no limits…appalling parasites

  • Random Bloke 9th September 2015 at 10:36 am

    What are they on about? BTL hasn’t made any contribution to housing provision nor did it “play a significant role in housing provision” Other than mop up homes that would otherwise have been bought by First Time Buyers.
    BTL is a monster that has got completely out of hand, whjen it was brought in Govt stupidly thought it would trigger new rented developments, not that lenders would rush to fund amateur landlords and weaken productive investment. If people went in for “build to let” this change wouild not have happened.