View more on these topics

Mortgage market study must focus on big picture, says Smee


Mortgage market research is in danger of data overload

When the FCA announced the mortgage market study in December, we welcomed the constructive approach to view lenders’ practices and potential influences on customer outcomes. Four months on, at the data collection stage, there is growing concern that the study is lacking the focus needed to accomplish its goals.

The MMR in 2014 created a seismic shift in how mortgages are sold, so it is entirely right that the FCA reviews its effect. And it is better that it is looking at how distribution is working now, when things look benign, than in five years’ time after concluding that things have gone wrong.

It is helpful that the study will look at the whole range of players involved in the mortgage and house-buying process, and what drives and influences the products to which consumers have access.

However, the volume and variation of data currently being requested of lenders by different parts of the FCA feels excessive and possibly counterproductive to its aims – especially the requests around the market study.

The timescales are simply too tight for meaningful analysis and, while lenders had expectations of an onerous request for data, the scale still feels disproportionate.

Working towards finding out how borrowers can get the best deal is a worthy venture, but can the regulator find the right answers by overburdening lenders with requests for data? That killer piece of data that ensures all borrowers are driven to the best outcome simply does not exist. If it did, something would come along and move the goalposts anyway.

Micro-management of markets, even in the name of competition, does not usually work. It will be more constructive to stick to big themes and act only where palpable detriment is identified.

Paul Smee is director general of the Council of Mortgage Lenders


FCA logo new 3 620x430

AMI warns FCA proc fee ban would harm consumers

Any move by the Financial Conduct Authority to ban procuration fees in favour of charging for advice would be harmful to consumers, the Association of Mortgage Intermediaries has warned. The regulator is currently looking at proc fees as part of a wider consultation mortgage remuneration. The latest AMI quarterly review says: “In order to pay […]

Leeds appoints Hoole as Bristol & South West BDM

Leeds Building Society has appointed John Hoole as business development manager for Bristol and the South West. Hoole (pictured) joins Leeds from TSB, where he was telephone business development manager. Leeds Building Society head of intermediary distribution Martese Carton says: “John’s appointment demonstrates our commitment to strengthening our service proposition to support more borrowers and help […]


Government unveils letting agent fee ban details

  The Government has today laid out its plans to ban unfair letting agent fees in a drive to encourage better competition in the rental market. The measures will stop hidden charges and end tenants being hit by costly upfront payments that can be difficult to afford. The proposals also ban any letting agent fees […]

India rate cut – more to come?

Kunal Desai, Head of Indian Equities at Neptune Investment Management India’s stockmarket rallied this week following news that the central bank was cutting interest rates more aggressively than expected. Commenting on the rate cuts and what this means for India’s economic growth, Kunal Desai notes that there were two important details in the announcement that have […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
  • Post a comment
  • Gary Styles 13th April 2017 at 3:34 pm

    I tend to agree with you Paul up to some extent. But unfortunately there are several areas of the process that need closer examination. For example reciprocity in the mortgage and house sale process.