View more on these topics

Jeremy Duncombe: Retention proc fees are essential


Lenders who pay fees contribute to better service for clients

The introduction of the MMR in 2014 had a significant impact on brokers’ workloads due to the more stringent affordability testing and lengthier advice process it created.

Most lenders have raised their procuration fees to reflect the changes, but retention proc fees have been almost forgotten. It is paramount that more lenders pay proc fees on retention business. Brokers still need to go through the full advice process in these cases, requiring them to dedicate an equal amount of time and effort as they would with new business.

Tasks such as maintaining contact with clients and holding regular reviews, as well as notifying customers during the months before maturity, are a significant part of a broker’s role. Intermediaries should be rewarded for providing the best advice for the customer but equally they must play their part by ensuring they are not just concentrating on new business.

Lenders should invest in their systems to enable the payment of retention proc fees, so brokers can, in turn, invest further in their own systems and provide a better level of service for the customer.

Paying a fee for retention business will also benefit lenders who choose to do so.

Building goodwill with brokers helps with relationships, increases awareness and boosts choice, creating a win for all parties. It is encouraging to see more lenders, such as Cambridge Building Society, beginning to recognise this.

That said, there is still a long way to go. I hope to see more lenders follow in Woolwich, Halifax, BM Solutions, Clydesdale and Metro Bank’s footsteps by making retention proc fees part of their new year’s resolutions.

Jeremy Duncombe is director of Legal & General Mortgage Club



Pressure builds on lenders to review maximum age criteria

Pressure is building on lenders to review their maximum age limits after two firms this week loosened their lending into retirement criteria. Prior to the Mortgage Market Review many lenders tightened their criteria when lending to borrowers whose loans extend beyond retirement or those wishing to borrower post-retirement. While many of the big lenders require […]


Complete FS founding director returns after 8 years

Damian Cain, a founding director of Complete FS, has returned to the packager after eight years. Cain and Mike Hill set up the firm in 1993, with the former leaving in 2008 to launch a student buy-to-let business. He has taken on the responsibility for all of the packager’s major accounts and developing business in […]


Mortgage approvals rocket by 20%

Total mortgage approvals shot up 20.7 per cent year-on-year in November, according to the latest Bank of England lending figures. There were 121,505 loans approved in November, up from 100,629 a year earlier, the figures show. Mortgage Advice Bureau head of lending Brian Murphy says: “Approvals now stand significantly higher than they did in November […]


B2L experts: ‘Landlords must act now to avoid stamp duty hike’

Landlords have just a few weeks to submit their limited company applications or risk being stung with whopping stamp duty bills in April, say experts. In November’s Autumn Statement, Chancellor George Osborne revealed stamp duty rates for landlords would be 3 percentage points higher than residential purchases from 1 April. On a property worth £275,000, […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
  • Post a comment
  • Chris Hulme 14th January 2016 at 3:25 pm

    The early days of MMR roughly trebled the workload of the broker in sourcing, application processes and compliance but these later days of continuing servicing isn’t just an issue fiscally, it is an issue on the transaction where some lenders still don’t have broker product switch options, proc fee or not.
    We should, as Jeremy points out, congratulate the lenders who have taken the step to work with brokers on product switching and payment of the appropriate proc fee for that work but we do also need more pressure on those lenders who simply use the broker to get the client in and cut them out thereafter – the lender that do not have any product switch options that can be arranged by the broker.
    The pressure should persuade lenders that actions in supporting your broker client as well as your borrower client are equally important in the TCF and TBF.

  • Stuart Gregory 14th January 2016 at 11:53 am

    Great that this is being highlighted – perhaps Woolwich can explain why they only however pay around 50% of their normal procuration fee for retention business – AND more importantly – why they only pay a procuration fee on the ‘elements’ of a mortgage switched.

    So, this means if your Woolwich client has three parts to their mortgage, but want to switch only two of them, and you retain the WHOLE mortgage for Woolwich – they only pay you for the two that switch. Which, is unfair.

    Our workload, as Jeremy correctly states, is the same for retaining a client for a lender as it is for a ‘new’ re-mortgage. Our compliance requirements don’t lessen as a result. I questioned Woolwich and was told ‘well, we don’t have to credit check the clients and our workload is less so that’s why you’re paid less’.

    Treating brokers fairly?!