View more on these topics

Is the new SHIP steering too far into uncharted waters?

In submerging Safe Home Income Plans into the new Equity Release Council but retaining the name, the promoters of this new enterprise have felt the need to keep a strong anchor from the past. 

I have a vested interest, as the representative of many broker firms that recommend equity release, but who has not been engaged in the detail of the new plans.  So part of what may follow is from ignorance, but certainly not from apathy on my part.

My concern for this new entity is that I am unsure how it will prioritise its various roles and more important, how it will be a democratic organisation reflecting the diverse views of its proposed widened membership. 

By all accounts it is not cheap to become a full member and that might be a pre-requisite to a seat at the top table.

In pursuing its diverse objectives who will decide the strategic direction and control delivery? 

Also whose interests will take priority; consumers, lenders, the SHIP standards, brokers or perhaps the wider national interest?

I see the following as within the new Council’s proposed compass:

·     Promoting equity release with politicians and regulators

·     Maintaining SHIP standards

·     Operating a disciplinary process for those who breach the new standards

·     Protecting lender interests

·     Protecting broker interests

·     Working with solicitors and valuers to deliver a safe product

·     Moving equity release to be a core part of at retirement advice

·     Promoting equity release to consumers and the media.

While SHIP was all about lenders and standards, the new organisation has expanded its constituency to broaden its voice, but also to fund what it thinks it needs to have the right voice.  All of this is the correct thing to do, but the broad approach risks it lacking focus. Is this a standards body, a regulator, an industry promotions board or a trade body? 

More particularly how do all the various types of members have an effective and democratic voice?

Equity release is a regulated product via the Financial Services Authority.  It sets the rules on how the product can work and be sold. We pay a lot of money for them to get this right.  I am not sure I want another body setting more rules and standards that can be used by the Ombudsman and courts to set much higher standards.  Because these will be seen as industry led, these higher standards risk being applied to all in the industry, whether members of the new council or not.

Having submerged the SHIP and kept the anchor, we risk all being dragged along by a lot of well-intentioned but financially led compromises.  It will require some deft and articulate leadership to balance these competing priorities and interest.

Recommended

60 seconds with… Colin Bell, chief executive officer, Interbay

Did news that the JC Flowers-owned OneSavings Bank was in advanced talks to buy Interbay come as a surprise? No, we’ve been working on it for about six months now. Since we withdrew from the market in 2008 we’ve been speaking to potential investors to allow us to return to lending. What made OneSavings Bank’s […]

andy frankish

Brokers defend NewBuy take-up of 400 reservations since launch

Some 400 properties have been reserved through the government’s NewBuy Guarantee scheme since it launched just over two months ago, figures from the Home Builders Federation show. Critics have been quick to attack the figure, saying 400 reservations is inadequate and that the government will fall short of its target of 100,000 NewBuy sales in […]

Most mortgage fraud takes place in the B2L sector, says PMS boss

The buy-to-let sector is where most of the fraudulent activity in the mortgage market is occurring, according to John Malone, executive chairman of PMS. Speaking at the Mortgage Business Expo in Manchester last week, Malone, who is also brokers’ representative on the National Fraud Authority’s Mortgage Fraud Forum, told delegates: “There is a big problem […]

1

Marketwatch – June 2012

Heroes&villains Hero of the week London mayor Boris Johnson for visiting Coreco Group and reaffirming his support for apprenticeships, the London housing market, mortgage brokers and small to medium sized firms. Villain of the week The Financial Services Authority for increasing fees payable by mortgage firms. At a time like this when income for many […]

China tech and Global Alpha: a new great leap forward

By Robin Geffen, Fund Manager and CEO

Internet giant Alibaba is exactly the type of entrepreneurial company that the high-conviction, top-performing Neptune Global Alpha Fund seeks to invest in. Established just 14 years ago in an apartment in Hangzhou, today Alibaba is larger than Amazon and eBay put together and is challenging some of the most powerful internet companies in the world…

Read more 


Important information

Investment risks

The value of an investment and any income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Forecasts and past performance are not a guide to future performance. Some information and statistical data herein has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable but in no way are warranted by us as to their accuracy or completeness. These are Neptune’s views and as such this document is deemed to be impartial research. We do not undertake to advise you of any change to our views.

Comments
  • Post a comment
  • HW 1st June 2012 at 5:43 pm

    Yawn……………..yet another attempt by SHIP to justify its existence. Will it make me a better adviser? No. Will it increase my turnover? No. Do I need SHIP? No. Do SHIP need me? Obviously. Best let SHIP slowly sink.

  • Roger Pangbourne 1st June 2012 at 11:29 am

    The clear common goal of the ERC is the continued safe growth of Equity Release – not giving favour to one or other set of members.

    SHIP has been one of those rare things – a Trade Association that has genuinely improved matters and moved the industry forwards.

    If it means paying the regulator and a trade association for this to happen, surely this is money well spent.

  • Geoff Green 1st June 2012 at 9:45 am

    Its a shame you don’t put the same about of thought into AMI.

  • Geoff Green 1st June 2012 at 9:45 am

    Its a shame you don’t put the same about of thought in AMI.