View more on these topics

Scottish purchase loans reach 16-year low

There were 47,000 Scottish house purchase loans advanced over 2009, down 23% on 2008 and the fewest in the sixteen years the Council of Mortgage Lenders has been producing the data.

As a result of the slower upturn, Scotland’s share of all house purchase loans fell to 8% in Q4, the lowest share in nearly three years. The 9% share for 2009 as a whole was down from a high of 12% in 2008.

There were 14,200 loans for house purchase in Q4, worth £1.6bn  – up 4% by number and 5% by value from the preceding three months.

Growth in the Scottish market was a little slower than in the UK as a whole – which saw a 9% increase in house purchase activity in Q4 and a 62% increase year on year.

The rise in Scotland from the last three months of 2008 was 22% by volume and 19% by value, illustrating how the market improved over the course of 2009 from its low of 7,600 loans – worth £785m in Q1.

The number of first-time buyers in Scotland was unchanged at 5,400 in Q4. But the value of lending to first-time buyers increased in the last three months from £474m to £479m, and the number of loans was up from 4,100 – worth £368m year-on-year.

Home movers saw a rise in activity from 8,400 loans, worth £1bn in the Q3 to 8,800 – worth £1.1bn in Q4.

Neither home movers nor first-time buyers saw much change in size of deposits or income multiples but mortgage interest payments as a proportion of income, one of many ways to assess affordability, fell significantly, particularly for the latter group – from 14.2% of income in the third quarter to 13% in Q4. This is the lowest level since 2004.

In line with the rest of the UK, remortgaging volumes remain low in Scotland. There were 9,000 remortgage loans , worth £900m in the fourth quarter – down from 10,000 – worth £1bn in the preceding three months and from 16,000 – worth £1.6bn in the last three months of 2008. For the whole of 2009, there were 39,000 loans – worth £4.4bn for remortgage, down from 74,000 – worth £7.4bn in 2008.
Kennedy Foster, policy consultant at CML Scotland, says: “We do not anticipate an increase in lending activity immediately. Funding conditions remain challenging, economic recovery is fragile both in Scotland and in the UK as a whole, and with little likelihood of interest rates rising this side of an election, many on low variable rates have little incentive to remortgage.
“A combination of bad weather in the early part of the year and the end of the stamp duty holiday will also have affected housing market activity, and will reinforce the slow start to 2010. However, the situation is much improved on a year ago, and a gradual improvement in market conditions and the wider economy should support a modest increase in activity later in the year.”



Ban brokers from paying referral fees to estate agents, urges OFT

The Office of Fair Trading is urging the government to ban mortgage brokers from paying referral fees to estate agents. A study on home buying and selling published by the OFT last week recommends that the government should consider additional rules on fees received by estate agents for referring buyers to providers of ancillary services […]

The mortgage mole


Brokers will pay the price of misguided bid for perfection

I was interested to read a recent article on Mortgage Strategy Online revealing that the Financial Services Authority is upping its annual funding by almost 10% while brokers will have to cough up a minimum of £1,000 to be regulated. As there is a diminishing number of brokers to fine the FSA clearly thinks it […]

Self-cert not needed if lenders educated their underwriters

There is no need for self-cert products. What is required is a sustained effort from lenders to educate their underwriters to assess cases on their merits. The reason self-cert and fast-track exist is for lenders to be able to distribute products faster using brokers as a conduit. Now that business levels have dropped, lenders should […]

InFocus - thumbnail

In Focus — February 2015

Jelf Employee Benefits looks at the issue of paying anaesthetist fees when the patient had no chance to discuss or agree to them prior to care; and provides recommendations for avoiding this scenario.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up