View more on these topics

Lloyds reports losses of £6.3bn

Lloyds Banking Group has reported a loss of £6.3bn for 2009, compared to a £6.7bn loss in 2008.

On a statutory basis, the group delivered a profit before tax of £1bn for 2009.

This result includes an £11.2bn negative goodwill gain associated with the purchase of HBOS, given the acquistion of the business at half book value in anticipation of the likely losses resulting from their troubled asset portfolios.

There has been a significant increase in impairments, which rose to £24.0bn from £14.9bn in 2008, principally due to the HBOS portfolios and their high level of exposure to commercial property.

Gross new mortgage lending at the group totalled £35bn during 2009, representing a market share of 24%.

The group says it has continued to make good progress in building its mortgage business in a contracting market by focusing on the prime mortgage market, “particularly through its network rather than intermediaries”.

More than 60% of new lending in 2009 being for house purchase rather than for re-mortgage. In March 2009, the group committed to increase its planned gross lending to home buyers by £3bn in the following12 months and say it is on track to deliver this commitment.

The average LTV ratio at the end of 2009 was 54.8% compared with 54.9%  at the end of 2008, whilst the average LTV ratio on new residential lending in 2009 was 59% compared with 63% in 2008.

The percentage of mortgage cases more than three months in arrears increased to 2.3% at December 31 2009 compared to 1.8% as at December 31 2008.

Meanwhile, the stock of repossessed properties also reduced by 32% to 2,720 properties compared to 4,011 properties at the end of 2008 and, as a proportion of total accounts, remains lower than the industry average.

Based on the most recent published figures by the Council of Mortgage Lenders, the Group is performing marginally better than the industry average.

Recommended

It’s likely that fraud is rife as brokers try to boost income

Am I alone in surmising that brokers must still be regularly perpetuating mortgage fraud by placing self-cert business through fast-track lenders? A recent Mortgage Strategy poll indicating only 25% would accept fast-track disappearing, along with Abbey’s more vigilant stance shows that despite the mess our industry and country are in, fraud is probably still rampant. […]

Awards evening gets an ’80s vibe with Boy George

The great and the good of the industry gathered for the prestigious Mortgage Strategy Awards at the Gros- venor House Hotel last Wednesday The Mortgage Advice Bureau scooped the award for best mortgage broker, with Woolwich taking home the best lender accolade. David Shortt was praised for his work in the mortgage market and scooped […]

JOANNE SMITH, CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CREATIVE OFFICER, THE CONSULTING CONSORTIUM

FSA’s actions are an emotive subject

It’s clear that on announcing his departure from the Financial Services Authority, chief executive officer Hector Sants created a stir in the press. Now clearly the FSA and Sants have had to deal with their fair share of turmoil over the past couple of years. Indeed there have even been accusations that it is the […]

What triggers the MPAA?

Jim Grant – Senior Product Insight & Technical Support Analyst There’s sometimes confusion around what triggers the money purchase annual allowance. Find out what does and what doesn’t trigger the MPAA. The money purchase annual allowance (MPAA) is a reduced annual allowance that can apply to contributions to defined contribution (DC) schemes. The following table […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
Comments
  • Post a comment
  • Nick 28th February 2010 at 10:40 am

    That is a really good point i have a current a/c with lloyds, mortgage with Halifax. In my mind i think they are still different companies, but they are not, or at least nearly all owned by the govt?

  • Jon 26th February 2010 at 2:04 pm

    With a market share of 24% via branches, if it added intermediary business it would probably be accused that its market share was too great.

  • Andy 26th February 2010 at 12:32 pm

    Interesting admission they have concentrated on their branches rather than Intermediaries!