View more on these topics

Thursday night is bank bashing night

I watched the first big TV political debate but come last Thursday I decided to go out and watch Ghost at the cinema instead.


It’s about a Prime Minister as a war criminal and probably nearer to the truth than the current PM in Limbo would care to admit. Besides, I was able to catch up with all the debate rhetoric, replays and spin when I got home at around 11 o’clock.

That show, or rather debate, was supposed to be about foreign policy but once the Sky TV presenter moved Brown, Cameron and Clegg onto a more general agenda it was almost a replay of the first debate.

There was a little bank bashing, and a lot on immigration and the National Health Service, and of course an awful lot on how they were going to save the UK economy if not the universe.

So what can we expect in Thursday night’s debate which is the last of the three and focuses on the economy?

I suspect that last week’s news about the Goldman Sachs alleged sub-prime scam will set the tone and fresh faced and squeaky clean Nick Clegg will conveniently forget that back in 2004 he was in the lobbying business and one of his clients was Fred the Shred’s Royal Bank of Scotland.

Of course back then he was even younger than he is now and visa vie his idealism, he could claim that he was a late developer. Perhaps I’m labouring the point but back then he was quite happy to exploit his experience in Brussels politics to persuade the European Union to side with a soft touch regulatory regime.

Brown, the architect of the Tripartite regulatory regime in the UK, was at that time equally happy to ride on the back of our success in banking and finance.

Indeed, he took pains to be associated closely with the likes of Sir Fred Goodwin but no doubt, like Clegg, he’ll also experience a bout of selective amnesia and along with the others will compete to bash the banks because that’s what the voters want and what politicians do best.

And given the public mood they’ll all want to support the International Monetary Funds’ latest proposals – the creation of a Financial Stability Contribution (a levy to meet the cost of bank bailouts yet to come) and a financial activities tax on bank profits and remuneration.

As Bob Lyddon, managing director of the international banking group IBOS points out, these will force banks to close their more marginal operations overseas, which rely on higher risk activities that provide the most profit, and concentrate on their home markets.

This, he says, “will cause a return to the domestic banking of the 1980s” and as a consequence undermine the establishment of strong Pan European banks which would have had the  scale to be cost competitive and operate on a truly global level.

That’s not quite what the doctor would order given the mortgage funding crisis that awaits us after the election but it also begs another question raised by David Smith, economics editor of the Sunday Times.

“There was no such levy before the crisis”, he observes, “ but to play the devil’s advocate, you could argue that the huge tax take from Britain’s financial sector, poured into public services, could have been used in part to make sure the public finances were in good enough shape to cope with a crisis.”

The question that Smith poses is, if such financial stability funds are not ring fenced, can we be confident that they will not be dissipated in the same way again?



High LTV deal is commendable but I am still miffed

In response to Abbey’s new 90% LTV product, without getting carried away I think it’s a push in the right direction. Realistically if it’s a success for Santander other lenders will look to get involved in the higher LTV market. But on a personal note I am reluctant to give the lender any support due […]

Mutuals come out on top for service

Findings of independent research from GfK NOP and published by the Building Societies Association shows mutuals have outperformed banks across various aspects of customer service, including treating customers fairly, value for money and being trusted to give good advice.


L&C scoops gong for best adviser firm

London & Country has been voted best mortgage adviser firm in’s Media IFA Of The Year Awards. David Hollingworth, mortgage adviser at L&C, also scooped the award for best mortgage adviser. Ray Boulger, senior technical manager at John Charcol, and James Carter, principal of Independent James, won the runners-up accolades. Karen Barrett, chief executive […]


Guide: how to change your auto-enrolment support

As we approach the two-year milestone of auto-enrolment, employers have had the opportunity to truly assess the capabilities of their chosen support. They are also now realising that getting to the staging date was the easy part, and that support is required for almost every aspect of the day to day running of their scheme. With the three-year re-enrolment window coinciding for many with the total removal of commission and Active Member Discounts from pension-related products and services, as well as the introduction of the pension charge cap in April 2015, many employers will have no choice but to review their support options. But, what is involved in transitioning your auto-enrolment scheme away from your current support options? This guide from Johnson Fleming aims to outline some of these key areas and provide information and discussion points on what you need to consider.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up