View more on these topics

FSA takes action against banks over complaint handling

The Financial Services Authority has found weaknesses in five banks over their handling of customer complaints and has referred two of the banks to enforcement for further investigation.

The review looked at several banking groups responsible for over 70% of the complaints firms receive and report to the FSA and over 60% of those resolved by the Financial Ombudsman Service.

It found poor standards of complaint handling within most of the banks assessed, including:

  • A lack of senior management engagement and accountability for the delivery of fair complaint handling;
  • Poorly designed staff incentive schemes that made branch staff reluctant to pay redress to customers, even in situations where the bank was at fault;
  • Poor quality complaint handling by staff in branches and general call-centres leading to inadequate investigations, poor decision making as to the outcome of the complaint and unsatisfactory correspondence with customers;  
  • Complaint handling procedures that led to staff issuing multiple, repetitive responses to customers, forcing them to restate their complaint a number of times in the face of ongoing negative responses from the bank;
  • The failure of banks to learn from previous complaints and to make changes to prevent similar complaints arising in the future.

Importantly, the FSA did find examples of good and compliant practices in parts of some of the banking groups assessed.  This demonstrates it is possible for banks to handle high volumes of complaints and deliver fair outcomes for consumers.

Dan Waters, the FSA’s director of conduct risk, says: “A culture of fair complaint handling is an important indicator of whether a firm is committed to treating its customers fairly.  It is vital that customers know that if something goes wrong, their complaint will be dealt with in a reasonable way and that they will get a fair outcome.

“While we found some good practice, there is clearly evidence of unacceptable standards of complaints handling in banks.  Delivering change in this area is a major priority and we are determined to use all the tools available to us to ensure that banks comply with our rules.”

To assist all firms in meeting its requirements, the FSA has published a complaints handling file review template, which firms may wish to use to help them assess if their complaint handling is achieving fair outcomes for customers.  

The FSA is also reviewing whether it needs to make changes to its existing rules on complaint handling and will be publishing its proposals in the third quarter of this year.

Recommended

income protection claimants

Generation Rent

By Denise Wond, Marketing Relationship Manager, Royal London We’ve heard a great deal about Generation Rent in recent years but what does it actually mean for consumers and advisers and has the face of the typical renter changed? The picture is certainly more diverse than it used to be Homeownership has fallen to 64 per […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
Comments
  • Post a comment
  • Anon 28th April 2010 at 11:10 am

    Five or six ?

    The FSA report talks about six banks in chapter 4 – did one get away ?

  • Metal Mickey 28th April 2010 at 10:47 am

    The FSA should perhaps put their own house in order before accusing banks of poor handling of customer complaints. My own experience of bringing serious breaches of their own rulebook to the attention of the FSA is that they couldn’t care less and are determined to remain unaccountable to anyone.

    “A lack of senior management engagement and accountability for the delivery of fair complaint handling” pretty much sums up the FSA’s approach.

  • Bobby 28th April 2010 at 10:26 am

    Odd isn’t it that even though the FSA know the Banks are the main culprits they still allow, neigh, encourage an execution only non advised tick box mortgage marketplace through them.