View more on these topics

FSA fines Kensington £1.2m

The Financial Services Authority has fined Kensington Mortgage Company £1.225m for poor treatment of some customers facing mortgage arrears.

The firm has agreed to redress customers who were in arrears and charged specific unfair and/or excessive charges.  

It is estimated that the redress will cost the firm up to £1.066m.

The FSA has identified a number of serious failings by Kensington which occurred between 1 January 2007 and 31 October 2008 in relation to its mortgage arrears handling processes and in its dealings with customers in arrears.

These include:

– A fee for a returned direct debit which was charged regardless of how many times the direct debit had already been returned unpaid;

– An excessive fee for cancelled direct debits which did not reflect administrative costs;

– An early repayment charge on mortgage balances which included arrears fees and charges within that balance.

The firm also failed to take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively, and to ensure adequate risk management systems.  

Its management information focused on the performance of the firm’s mortgage book and the profitability of the business, rather than on treating customers fairly.

Kensington qualified for a 30% discount under the FSA’s settlement discount scheme.  

Without the discount the fine would have been £1.75 million.   

The FSA has also taken into account that Kensington has made significant improvements to its arrears and repossession processes since the early part of 2008.

Margaret Cole, director of enforcement and financial crime, says: “This case should serve as a strong reminder to firms dealing with retail customers, especially customers in a vulnerable position such as those with mortgage arrears, that the FSA will take robust action where it sees that customers are not treated fairly.  

“Retail firms which fail in their obligations to customers should expect not only a substantial fine but also that they will have to pay back customers who have been disadvantaged.”

In a statement today, Kensington says: “We apologise to all those customers who were impacted during this period and we are working to redress those customers affected as quickly as possible.

“This was a retrospective investigation into arrears processes and our charges were in line with the market at the time.

“However, we acknowledge that there were certain fees where it was felt that the charge did not accurately reflect the additional work and cost incurred by Kensington. We no longer charge these fees and will be writing to customers who have been affected.”

Its fees will be redressed as follows:

  • A proportion of the charge for cancellation of monthly mortgage payment by Direct Debit when in arrears.                                                         (average refund £8.75)
  • Charge for administration of more than 3 consecutive returned Direct Debits when in arrears.                                                                              (average refund £25)
  • Early Repayment Charges applied to arrears fees and charges as part of the total balance.                                                                   (average refund £37)

Kensington says it will be contacting those customers who have been affected by 31 May.

As at October 2008, Kensington had approximately £1.1bn of loans on its balance sheet and securitised assets in the region of £2.1bn.

During the Relevant Period, Kensington administered on average 39,042 regulated mortgage contracts a month with a total balance of approximately £4.6bn.



Go-aheads increase for mortgages on overseas homes

The overseas property market could be seeing signs of a pick-up, with Conti experiencing its busiest month for almost a year in terms of mortgage go-aheads. A go-ahead is the point at which prospective buyers take their mortgage quotes to the application stage. Go-aheads increased by 48% in March compared with February. The proportion of […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
  • Post a comment
  • Lee Wisener 15th April 2010 at 12:18 pm

    Do HML not service all of Kensingtons loans? Or is some serviced in house?

  • audra thorpe 12th April 2010 at 6:24 pm

    kensington would advise if a better rate could be given and would ask why the client has been placed on sub prime rate when a high street rate can be given. main reason for going with kensington was the self cert product, not having to produce accounts…..

  • Exasperated me 12th April 2010 at 2:29 pm

    I wonder how many of their ‘customers’ could have obtained a mortgage at high street rates if it weren’t for the proc fees..