View more on these topics

Cascading could land brokers in deep water

Single lender cascading has the potential to be the next mis-selling scandal, fuelling the sort of compensation feeding frenzy that we’ve seen with endowment policies. We must act now.

First we need to be clear what the Financial Services Authority says in the Mortgage Conduct of Business rulebook about ensuring that a recommended mortgage is suitable for a client.

Along with stipulating that, on the basis of the facts disclosed by customers, the product is the most suitable of those the adviser has available, in MCOB at 4.7.8 it states: “A firm should, out of all the regulated mortgage contracts identified as being appropriate for that customer, recommend the one that is the least expensive for that customer taking into account those pricing elements identified by the customer as being most important to him.”

Let’s see this in practice when applied to a single lender cascade. You choose a lender’s rate based on a sourcing system at 5.09% for a two-year fixed rate.

You score the case with an online decision in principle system and due to the client’s circumstances you are not offered 5.09% rate but 7.29%. You inform the client, the client accepts the information given and the case goes on to complete.

The problem intensifies when you consider the consequences.

The case above concerns a real client we inherited from one of our brokers after completion. Had the case been through multi-lender cascading, it would have fitted a two-year fixed rate of 5.79% and with lower fees.

If you look at the interest payments and fee saving, this client would have ended up £5,120 better off than with their single lender cascading deal. Unfortunately, the redemption penalty was so high that a remortgage was not advisable.

The client is seeking compensation through the adviser who recommended the original scheme.

Some cynics will see some self-preservation in the point I’m about to make, but there has never been a better time to promote the much maligned role of mortgage packagers. If a packager has a big enough panel it will multi-lender cascade.

We all know the sub-prime market contains some clients who will be happy to jump on the next mis-selling bandwagon. If you can’t show a suitable audit trail you are leaving yourself wide open.

I’m sure most brokers do their jobs properly and can show they are treating customers fairly. But like virtually everything else in life, I suspect it will be the few who spoil it for the ethical many.


Goldsmith Williams sponsors MS Summit

Conveyancing firm Goldsmith Williams is to sponsor Mortgage Strategys Packager Summit in the south of France. The two-day event is expected to welcome around 75 packaging companies which will chew over future developments in the packagers market.Running between January 24 and 26, the Nice-based summit will also see the launch of Mortgage Distributor Mortgage Strategys […]

Complete extends underwriting team

Complete Mortgage and Loan Services has made four new appointments to its underwriting team.Karren Dixon and Tracey Stansfield join Complete as underwriters. Dixon, who will work across both prime and sub-prime business, joins from The Mortgage Lender having previously worked for Purely Mortgages. Stansfield also joins Complete from TML, having previously worked for Bristol and […] slashes leads price is offering half-price mortgage leads until the end of February across its standard scheme.In 2005 and 2006 over 90% of registered intermediaries used the promotion, prompting to run the offer for a third year. It says people typically look to reassess their finances in the months of January and February, often with a […]

L&G to hold mortgage business forums

Legal & General will be holding a series of regional business forums for its business partner firms. The annual events take place in Manchester, London and Belfast on January 31, February 2 and February 6 respectively. Attendees will be able to share best practice, understand the impact of regulatory activity on their business and learn […]

Pensions - thumbnail

Changes to capped drawdown tables

The tables used for capped drawdown maximum income calculations have been updated. We look at the reasons for the change and what the impact could be. Changes to capped drawdown tables Capped income drawdown involves taking a pension directly from a fund instead of buying an annuity. However, there’s a limit on the maximum amount […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up