View more on these topics

Interdependence fined £125,000 by FSA

The Financial Services Authority has fined Interdependence £125,000 for serious failings in the supervision of appointed representatives who were advising customers to withdraw cash early from their pensions.

The FSA concluded that the ineffectiveness of the firm&#39s systems and controls led to the risk that several hundred customers may have been mis-sold these contracts.

Interdependence is currently undertaking a past business review of a sample of 65 pension cases to identify whether or not customers may have been disadvantaged between January 1996 and March 2002.

The review is scheduled to be concluded by June 30 2004. A decision will then be made as to whether an extended past business review should be conducted into additional pension sales during this period. If mis-selling is identified then arrangements will be put in place to pay compensation where appropriate.

David Kenmir, retail intermediaries sector leader at the FSA, says: “These findings are particularly serious as they affect the pension assets of vulnerable customers approaching retirement. Firms must ensure that their recommendations to clients are suitable and they should build this principle into their monitoring of advisers. We will continue to keep a close eye on how appointed representatives are monitored.”

In 1996 the firm set up a pre-approval system to monitor cases where customers were releasing cash from their pensions. It was intended that pensions specialists from the firm would review all aspects of each proposed transaction to make sure that the sale was suitable for the customer. But the FSA says this system did not work properly or effectively.

For example, although appointed representatives were required to send all of their pension fund withdrawal cases to the firm for pre-approval, there was no process for ensuring that appointed representatives did submit their cases or any way of recording those cases that

were not submitted.

The regulator adds that in 90% of all the cases submitted between March 1999 and March 2002 there is no evidence of transactions which should have been submitted for pre-approval actually being submitted.

Interdependence is now part of Tenet Group, which also owns Lime mortgage and general insurance network. It acquired Interdependence back in 2000.


How many times do I have to tell you the answer, MS?

From Barry CashThree times in recent months you have got 40% of the answers wrong in Mortgage Master or Mortgage Moron. Last week, despite my sending you the correct answers you again got question 4 wrong in your response on the Letters page. The deeds to a mortgaged property are held by the mortgagee so […]

First Active to target UK brokers

Royal Bank of Scotland is planning an aggressive attack on the mainstream UK mortgage market with the launch of its First Active brand distributing products solely through intermediaries on June 14. First Active was founded in 1861 in Ireland as the mutual Workingman&#39s Benefit, changing to First National in 1960 and then converting to a […]

Conveyancing arm is rebranded

Sherrards Solicitors, the Hertfordshire-based legal firm has rebranded its volume conveyancing and remortgaging division as &#39Homefast Property Lawyers&#39. Homefast is currently handling some 2000 transactions a month nationwide and provides services to three of the top five estate agency chains in the UK as well as five of the top 10 lenders. It also acts […]


The Bank of England&#39s MPC committee today voted to raise interest rates by 0.25%. A statement from the Bank says: “The global economic recovery is continuing. In the United Kingdom, official data and business surveys suggest that output growth remains around, or above, trend. Household spending, public consumption and investment have all grown strongly and […]

Nigeria cover image - thumbnail

White paper — Nigeria International Insights

Jelf Employee Benefits closely examines healthcare provision and challenges within Nigeria. This will be of particular interest to HR decision makers with employees based in Nigeria, and assesses the environment, risks, facilities and safeguards that are relevant to organisations that are actively deploying expatriate staff in this location.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up