View more on these topics

Nationwide U-turn over landlords with tenants on housing benefit

The Mortgage Works, Nationwide’s buy-to-let lending subsidiary, U-turned on its decision to stop lending to landlords who have tenants on housing benefits late on Friday afternoon last week.

On Wednesday last week, Mortgage Strategy revealed TMW had altered its criteria and had stopped new lending to landlords who have tenants receiving housing benefits, except in remortgage cases.

Prior to the decision to exclude landlords with tenants on housing benefits, the lender, which has a buy-to-let market share of around 20 per cent, would judge each application on a case-by-case basis.

The lender says the decision was made to U-turn on the exclusion after customers had approached it with concerns.

Nationwide divisional director of mortgages Richard Napier says: “The buy-to-Let sector is very important to us.  We have listened to concerns that have been expressed by some of our customers, over the last few days, and believe this is the right way forward for The Mortgage Works, for landlords and for their tenants.”

There are around 3.8 million households in private rented accommodation, 26 per cent of which – 982,000 households – receive housing benefits, according to Government figures.

Other lenders which will consider tenants on housing benefits include Aldermore, Manchester Building Society and Paragon and Mortgage Trust and all had confirmed last week that they had no immediate plans to follow The Mortgage Works’ lead by pulling out of lending to these borrowers.

While Nationwide confirmed last week that it had made the change, it refused to disclose why it took the decision.

Experts suggested the move was a reaction to the Government’s new benefit system, Universal Credits, which comes into effect this year.

The new system will cap benefits at £500 a week for couples and £350 for a single person, including housing benefit, and will mean fewer benefits are paid directly to the landlord, meaning the potential for some tenants to avoid paying their rent could increase.

When the news broke, many thought the move could be a disaster for these borrowers and their tenants, with the National Landlords Association warning it could leave many people homeless.

Paragon Mortgages director of mortgages John Heron says: “Lenders have a degree of responsibility and unless there is material evidence that tenants claiming housing benefit give rise to a higher risk of loss or default it is hard to explain why a lender would seek to exclude lending to landlords who were willing to work with tenants that encounter such difficulties.”



Treasury 480

Govt drops plans for BoE to cap LTVs

The Government has dropped proposals that would allow the Bank of England to cap loan-to-value ratios for mortgages.

1,522 homes bought under NewBuy in 2012

By the end of 2012, 1,522 home purchases had been completed under the Government’s NewBuy Guarantee scheme in England. Figures from the Department for Communities and Local Government today show the Government’s liability increased to £15.4m over the same period time while it incurred no costs. The main aim of the Government-guaranteed scheme is to […]

UK: mid-year review and outlook

By Mark Martin, manager of the Neptune UK Mid Cap Fund, and Scott MacLennan, manager of the Neptune UK Opportunities Fund H1 2014• Equity markets continued to show strength: despite a strong rally in 2013 driven by a market-wide re-rating, equity markets continued to generate positive returns for investors. Economic activity continued to be stimulated […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
  • Post a comment
  • Chris Gardner 31st May 2013 at 4:02 pm

    Its probably a simple bit of analysis that tells the lender that these deals are more likely to go into arrears hence they dont want to do them.

    Then because of an outcry by the liberalati they buckle.

    The problem is that the provision of social housing has been passed off to the private sector where decisions are made on a commercial not social basis.

  • Jeff 29th May 2013 at 10:20 am

    “Most housing benefit claimants will fall into at least one of these groups”

    I don’t get what you mean? They will be male or female? Will have an age? They may have religious beliefs?
    Are you suggesting if you statistically profile a segment of the population and there is slight bias to one area you cannot treat it differently due to indirect discrimination?

    Whether you agree with it or not, clearly Nationwide could see that housing benefit is being cut by the government, this means landlords that rely on tenants that recieve this may have a reduced income and therefore are more vunerable. This is clearly a credible risk, whether its one that is acceptable is up to their management.

  • Marie Broderick 28th May 2013 at 9:52 am

    The Eqaulity Act(2010) makes it clear that it is illegal to discrimminate against groups of people with protected characteristics either directly or indirectly. These characteristics include disability,age,sex, religion amongst others. Most housing benefit claimants will fall into at least one of these groups. It would therefore be wrong of Nationwide to draw up policies which indirectly discriminate against these groups of people.By refusing to accept housing benefit claimants as tenants the landlord will in most cases be in direct breach of the equality act too.


Why register with Mortgage Strategy?

Mortgage Strategy continues to be the market-leading B2B mortgage publication in the UK, and provides trusted, independent insight with the aim of helping, promoting and analysing the latest developments for mortgage professionals.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Mortgage Strategy Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, webinars and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Mortgage Strategy's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now