View more on these topics

Which? accuses financial services industry of poor advice

Which? has accused the financial services industry of being rife with poor advice and questionable sales tactics, following a year-long undercover investigation.

Researchers posing as first-time home-buyers visited banks, building societies and estate agents to test the advice given on insurance products sold with a mortgage.

Overall, the advice was misleading and lacking in care. It would have resulted in people being under or over insured, or buying unnecessary products that stretched their budget to the limit.

Just one out of 39 advisers gave acceptable advice, asking enough questions and making the right recommendation. The rest were a poor show: 23 recommended life insurance that wasn&#39t needed – the researchers had enough &#45 and only three of the 25 who recommended critical illness insurance explained what was and wasn&#39t covered; and of 30 advisers who recommended cover, only 11 worked out how much their &#39client&#39 could afford.

Companies earn fat commissions, typically worth hundreds of pounds, for selling protection including life cover, critical illness and income protection to home-buyers.

But Which? says these policies are expensive and complicated, and the investigation shows that too many advisers can&#39t be trusted to ensure people will be properly protected if they can&#39t work.

Some advisers even resorted to cynical shock tactics to sell policies. An adviser from Halifax estate agents told one undercover researcher his cousin had just developed breast cancer. A Your Move adviser said he was attending a funeral later that day for a 42 year old who had died of leukaemia.

From next January, the Financial Services Authority will be responsible for policing this type of advice. But Which?&#39s investigation shows that companies have a long way to go to comply with regulations. Which? is also concerned that complicated products such as CI and IP are to be regulated in the same way as simpler car and house insurance.

Malcolm Coles, editor, Which?, says: “The investigation exposes serious problems with the way advisers work. It&#39s appalling to use scare tactics that could dupe people into spending hundreds of pounds each year on cover they don&#39t need.

“And while Which? is glad a tightening up of selling practices is on the horizon, we&#39re not convinced it&#39ll be enough. The FSA needs to do its own mystery shopping, and fine any company that breaks the rules.”

Recommended

Slapped wrists for MS staffers

From Peter MotsonI write to advise you that there are errors in the Mortgage Master or Mortgage Moron pages in Mortgage Strategy, May 24: Question 2: The level of debt on an interest-only mortgage does not reduce during the term, so should be protected by level term assurance, not decreasing term. So in this instance […]

Lending grew by £11.1bn in April, reveals Bank of England

The Bank of England has revealed that total lending to individuals grew by £11.1bn or 1.1% in April. Seasonally adjusted, it was £0.3bn higher than the increase in March. The three-month growth rate fell to 14.7% from 14.9% in March but the twelve-month growth rate was unchanged at 14.7%. Secured lending grew by £9.8bn or […]

INV market grows despite bad press

Self-certification and fast-track loans outstanding amounted to £147bn or 19.2% of total mortgage balances at the end of 2003, a survey by the Council of Mortgage Lenders reveals. The survey of income non-verified lending shows about 6% of balances outstanding were self-cert deals, while the remaining 13% of INV balances comprised fast-track mortgages. New INV […]

A&L told: ignore small brokers at your peril

Ipswich has criticised Alliance & Leicester&#39s decision to cherry-pick intermediaries who do large volumes of business with the lender. But the building society says A&L&#39s move did not come as a surprise and warns that other large players will follow this lead. Ipswich sales and marketing director Paul Winter says A&L&#39s decision is short-sighted. He […]

hastings logo

Case study – employee engagement platform centralises benefits for higher uptake

Learn how Hastings Academies Trust adopted an employee engagement platform to reinforce unity among new and veteran employees with bespoke branding and segmentation technology. Download the free case study to learn how you too can: Strategically use branding to unite a spread out workforce and reinforce key values among staff Target your message to the […]