View more on these topics

We are having to interpret the FSA&#39s rules ourselves

From Chris Bishop

I sympathise with John Helliwell (Mortgage Strategy October 20). The answer to his question is on the Financial Services Authority&#39s website and I recommend that he studies it. This is not a course of action for the faint-hearted as the website will certainly never win any awards for plain English, although it makes excellent reading for any insomniacs among us.

I have made my own enquiries to various regulatory bodies as follows: I phoned the FSA, but it could not talk to me as my firm is an authorised representative through Sesame and therefore any questions should be directed through it. I phoned the General Insurance Standards Council with the same query, and it has yet to get back to me with an answer.

I then called the Mortgage Code Compliance Board, which was helpful and seemed to know exactly how the new regulatory requirements would affect my firm&#39s current situation. From what I understand, and this is without prejudice, John&#39s situation hinges on the term &#39legal entity&#39. The FSA will not accept a sole proprietor, partnership, firm or company to be an appointed representative for one aspect of its business (for example, life business as part of a network), and apply to it for direct authorisation for another aspect of the same business (such as mortgages and general insurance) in the same name.

In John&#39s case, he is an IFA with a firm of investment advisers and separately registered in his own name with the MCCB. If his mortgage business is conducted under a separate name (legal entity) to his life business, I think he will be able to apply for direct authorisation for mortgages. If he trades as John Helliwell and puts all his income in one bank account, I don&#39t think the FSA will deem this to be acceptable. He will need to set up Helliwell Mortgage Services, for example, and keep the income separate for accounting purposes.

If anybody knows any different, can they let us know as we are having to make major business decisions based on our own interpretation of the rules.

Chris Bishop

Partner

Coastal Insurance and Mortgage Services

Peacehaven

East Sussex

Recommended

Rooftop Mortgages cuts margins on medium and high adverse products

Rooftop Mortgages has reduced its margins across their medium and high adverse product range on mortgage products below 80% LTV. The reduction is as much as 0.45% depending on the product selected. The lender has also increased its maximum CCJ limit on the product range. Medium limits increase from £5,000 to £7,500 and heavy increases […]

Public “cautiously optimistic” over house prices

Britons are cautiously optimistic about the housing market for the next five years, with almost one in five expecting returns of more than 10%. In a Charcol-commisioned June survey of 1,000 adults conducted by National Opinion Polls, almost three in five of those questioned said they see property returns of less than 10% are more […]

M2000 launches DIY processing system

A software system has been launched which offers mortgage brokers the chance to process applications through to offer stage themselves. www.softpackaging.com, launched last week, offers brokers a web-based mortgage administration system allowing them to process a mortgage application through to offer stage. Full criteria and product information from lenders is listed on the system which […]

Education needed, not regulation, say compliance experts

Research says the government, not the Financial Services Authority, should be responsible for financial education Over 70% of financial services compliance experts believe consumer education is more important than tighter regulation when it comes to reducing mis-selling. The findings are based on research by Huntswood Outsourcing Solutions, conducted in conjunction with Financial World, the magazine […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up