View more on these topics

Sound of two hands clapping

Chris Cummingsdirector general,

Association of MortgageIntermediaries

In the mortgage distribution market place today, it is true to say that big is beautiful. Distribution channels that have enough size and scope to offer lenders guaranteed sales volumes are able to negotiate the most attractive exclusive products. This in turn helps to generate sales.

I don’t believe in astrology. I’m a Scorpio and we’re a sceptical bunch. I do believe in empirical evidence, sound research methodology, and the power of the cost/benefit analysis. I suppose it was how I was raised but I am long on evidence and short on belief. I like rigour of thought to be applied in regulatory matters too. I guess it is just because I used to be a cynic – but now I’m not so gullible.

The need for rational, logical, even methodical thought and action were further instilled in me as a management consultant where process was as prized as output and elegance of thought was particularly well regarded. That is why I always look for the bigger picture, the implications and the long-term results. I am, and will always continue to be suspicious of words that are deceptive. Such sound bites include ‘fairness’, ‘principles’, ‘vision’ and even ‘quick wins’. As one of my favourite management gurus Stefan Stern recently pointed out “quick wins” usually lead to long-term problems because they do not encourage a proper consideration of the outcomes.

It must be said at this point that I am in favour of principles-based regulation, or to give it the full acronym – TMTAMPBRR (the move towards a more principles-based regulatory regime). I firmly believe the promised regulatory dividend will be worth the disruption caused to the industry along the way.

The same is true for treating customers fairly. Who could argue that TCF has now passed into the sector’s lexicon. TCF is the Madonna of this regulator, rather like the pop star who only needs one name, TCF doesn’t even need to be pronounced in full for us to know exactly what we mean. I also believe TCF will help the industry grapple with some difficult issues and emerge as better, more professional and more focused on the consumer.

The sharpest of readers may have noted some of the inconsistencies between the language in these paragraphs. I do believe that these moves by the regulator are positive and welcome but I would like to see some further work being done to prove the case: we have seen the costs, surely the benefits could be identified? I say this not as a criticism but as a plea.” The dividend of a regulator less focused on process and more on outcomes is one to be eagerly embraced”When the regulator wishes to introduce new rules, a process of consultation must be gone through. This is both rigorous and for the benefit of all concerned: the consumer, the industry and even the regulator. This process helps us to identify where changes and improvements to the proposed regulation can be made.

Action through principles is harder to achieve as, rather like fairness, it is open to interpretation, it is open to dispute. I speak as a philosophy scholar well used to arguments about the definition of “the good” and even how one should live the “good life” although, strangely, this has nothing to do with Tom and Barbara’s small holding in Suburbia! If my years of study taught me anything, it was that there is a range of definitions on such matters as what is fair. In addition, my years in trade bodies taught me that ambiguity leads to risk – and we all know that risk is a risky business better sorted out than worried over or ignored.

As a trade body we have made our position clear on principles-based regulation: we are supportive of the move and want to work with the regulator to see it is delivered in a manner that firms can work with, can understand, and that does not increase their risk -profile, given the period of uncertainty that may arise.

The dividend of a regulator less focused on process and more on outcomes is one to be eagerly embraced. It should mean that good firms receive only positive, if interested, interactions with the regulator while the Financial Services Authority is free to spend more of its time both weeding out those firms that are deliberately trying to buck the system or which need help in rising to the challenges. The sooner the bad apples are eradicated, the sounder we will all sleep, as they sully the whole sector’s reputation.

I have long held it to be the case that effective regulation makes the sound of two hands clapping. The regulator and the industry must meet each other somewhere in the middle but the result is worth the journey. We know that the regulator has embarked on its journey toward more principles-based regulation As an industry we just need a little more evidence to ease our path.

Recommended

Thinc adds Britannia to panel

Thinc Group has added Britannia to its panel of lenders. This arrangement makes Thinc Group the only mortgage intermediary with Britannia on its lending panel. Alex Murray, director of mortgages at Thinc, says: I am delighted that Thinc has the opportunity of having access to a superb range of products and look forward to working […]

UCB Homeloans cuts fixed rates

UCB Homeloans has cut 0.15% from its residential self-cert and full status fixed rate deals. In the self-cert range, its two-year flexible fixed deal will be available at 5.84%, its three-year flexible fix at 5.79% and its five-year flexible fix at 5.74%. For full status, its two-year flexible fix is now 5.74% and its three-year […]

Retirement Plus to have authorised status

As from April 6 2007 Retirement Plus will be authorised by the Financial Services Authority.It will be regulated as a provider, arranger and administrator of home reversion plans.

Pink adds Victoria to its panel

Pink Home Loans has added Victoria Mortgages Funding to its packaging panel.Victoris offers two and three-year fixed and discounted options with no overhang.There is no maximum age, affordability based lending allowing up to five times joint income and true self-cert to 90% LTV for loans up to £250,000.David Copland, deputy managing director at Pink Home […]

China tech and Global Alpha: a new great leap forward

By Robin Geffen, Fund Manager and CEO

Internet giant Alibaba is exactly the type of entrepreneurial company that the high-conviction, top-performing Neptune Global Alpha Fund seeks to invest in. Established just 14 years ago in an apartment in Hangzhou, today Alibaba is larger than Amazon and eBay put together and is challenging some of the most powerful internet companies in the world…

Read more 


Important information

Investment risks

The value of an investment and any income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Forecasts and past performance are not a guide to future performance. Some information and statistical data herein has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable but in no way are warranted by us as to their accuracy or completeness. These are Neptune’s views and as such this document is deemed to be impartial research. We do not undertake to advise you of any change to our views.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up