View more on these topics

Labour thinks the proposed funds could stop buy-to-let overheating

Chris Cummings, director, AMI On the Treasury&#39s website, alongside the Budget download, is an opportunity to glance through the PIF consultation paper. What is it, what should we do about it, and wherein lies opportunity?

This consultation picks up on the main themes of the Miles and Barker reports. As Ruth Kelly, the financial secretary to the Treasury, remarks in her foreword to the consultation paper: “A healthy and stable property market is a key element in any successful economy.” So far so good, but she then goes on to say: “Over recent decades the UK property market has been a source of destabilising cycles – too often a barrier to growth and productivity.” Are you hearing echoes of the Miles&#39 review? In publishing this consultation paper the government wants comment on its belief that PIFs could stimulate more institutional investment in the residential sector, so securing: “… more efficient management, greater renewal and preservation of property and a more liquid supply of housing.”

It seems that the government has set stability in the housing market as a policy priority. Nobody can argue with the economic benefits a stable housing market would bring, but we have to be alive to the side effects of too much government interference: extra layers of regulation, increased costs and a less dynamic market.

This is a Treasury consultation paper and there are 19 questions, the responses to which must be with the Treasury by July 16 (preferably by email). AMI is developing an industry response on behalf of members.

One message that comes through the consultation paper is that there will be no extra money from the government either to make this proposal happen or in the form of tax breaks. It is repeated several times that the chancellor is not looking to reduce his tax-take from the market by introducing this measure. Indeed, questions 10 and 12 specifically make mention of the Treasury&#39s desire “to ensure no overall cost to the Exchequer”.

Chapter one looks at the overseas experienced of PIFs, real estate investment trusts, or limited property trusts. They are not only common in the US but also in Australia and across the Far East in Japan, Hong Kong and Singapore.

Apart from commercial property the government is clearly looking at PIFs for the residential sector. An emerging theme is that the government believes PIFs could present a solution to the worry that the buy-to-let sector is becoming overheated.

Chapter three presents some interesting thoughts on Stamp Duty. The consultation assumes the current Stamp Duty system remains stable with a scale of 1% to 4% charged for property transactions (Stamp Duty Land Tax), and Stamp Duty Reserve Tax at 0.5% on the value of share dealings. However, it notes that if successful, the PIF scheme would lead to fewer land transactions and more trading in the indirect market.

A warning note is sounded as any fall in the tax-take from SDLT might need to be made up elsewhere. Question 12 looks at these matters and asks for your bright ideas.

Recommended

Snatch fast-commission service grabs brokers

Optoma has launched an accelerated commission service called Snatch available to selected brokers, including MGM members. Under Snatch Optoma hands the entired proc fee it receives from lenders to brokers on exchange, rather than skimming a share for itself as most clubs do. It says it has negotiated top fees with a number of lenders […]

Mortgage Talk gives its top mortgage deals for the week

Mortgage Talk has unveiled its top mortgage deals for the week including The Chelsea&#39s fixedrate until the April 1 2006 at 4.64%. The deal has an arrangement fee of £590, but no valuation fee. Mortgage Talk&#39s top tip for long-term fixed rates is the Nottingham&#39s fixed rate deal available until August 31 2009 at 5.15%. […]

CML backs Which? campaign to regulate estate agents

The Council of Mortgage Lenders is lending its support to the Which? Move It campaign aimed at introducing mandatory regulation of estate agents. With research showing that less than half of consumers think that estate agents pass all offers to sellers, when failure to do so is a criminal act, Which? is adopting the unprecedented […]

Here are some ideas to really speed up the mortgage chain

From Rob FieldWith the government seemingly keen to speed up the mortgage process, it would have been advisable for it to have spoken to brokers, packagers and lenders to find out what really slows things down. It might then have got the necessary reality check – and some good ideas too. As all efforts in […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up