View more on these topics

I don’t know what all the fuss is about with interest-only

With regard to the negative responses from brokers to the Financial Services Authority’s speech at the Council of Mortgage Lenders’ conference when it said it has not banned interest-only mortgages, what exactly is everyone railing against?

The regulator only wants to stop interest-only mortgages being used as tools to cheapen housing affordability, as opposed to sophisticated wealthy clients looking to manage longer term cash flows and tax liabilities.

A maximum mortgage of £500,000 is a decent cut-off to distinguish between these two scenarios, while a 25% deposit protects the banks against falling house prices. The other way to distinguish between the two is to make sure it can be afforded on a repayment basis.

Annual checks by lenders that other arrangements are in place to pay off the mortgage at the end of the term which do not include sale of property or inheritance, nips potential problems in the bud.

It seems to me that many in the industry do not mind the UK wasting billions in bank bailouts leading to higher taxes and reduced services as long as they can maintain their revenues.

Name and address supplied

Recommended

MMR paper proves regulator does not understand industry

I was interested to read last week the Financial Services Authority’s proposals on distribution as part of the Mortgage Market Review. It called for new labels to describe a firm’s service as either restricted or independent, the axing of the Initial Disclosure Document and the requirement that firms disclose to customers whether they will consider […]

cornell.jpg

Marketwatch

Abbey’s plans to enter buy-to-let is welcome news in a sector lacking competition. And I was relieved to see the latest MMR paper contains ideas that will actually make things better for borrowers

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up