View more on these topics

Being an AR eases compliance burden

CHRIS TANNER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, HOMELOAN PARTNERSHIP
CHRIS TANNER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, HOMELOAN PARTNERSHIP

The Mortgage Market Review is going to change our industry and whether we agree with it or not, the most important task will be to ensure the cost of remaining compliant is worth paying, particularly as business acquisition remains challenging.

The debate over directly authorised and appointed representative status has been played out many times in the past.

But the impending effect of the MMR will increasingly weigh in favour of firms joining a network.

To remain a DA firm will take more resources not only financially, but also in terms of the increasing burden of proactive compliance.

One of the myths about becoming an AR is that it means a removal of independence. The presumption being that having someone else responsible for compliance means the AR firm is no longer master of its own destiny.

Certainly, every network and principal has its own interpretation of what represents best compliance practice. But the overall effect is no different to a DA firm taking advice from an outside compliance professional or its own internal compliance function.

Adviser firms must decide whether to try to swallow the extra compliance burden in terms of time and cost or risk not doing so when the regulator is becoming more proactive.

Alternatively, they can run an independent business under the umbrella of a well-founded and financed network and focus on helping clients rather than managing the expectations of the regulator.

Recommended

FOS upholds some complaints on banks’ mortgage payment errors

The Financial Ombudsman Service has found in favour of some cus-tomers affected by an error by Yorkshire and Clydesdale banks that meant thousands of customers underpaid on their mortgages. In August the banks apologised to 18,000 clients after it miscalculated their monthly payments, creating a shortfall on their mortgage. A spokesman for Clydesdale Bank says: […]

MMR paper proves regulator does not understand industry

I was interested to read last week the Financial Services Authority’s proposals on distribution as part of the Mortgage Market Review. It called for new labels to describe a firm’s service as either restricted or independent, the axing of the Initial Disclosure Document and the requirement that firms disclose to customers whether they will consider […]

Can you put a hat on?

By Sarah Scott, marketing consultant You might think the question in the title is a strange one. Perhaps even more so when you learn that it’s one of several asked as part of an assessment for Employment Support Allowance eligibility in the opening scenes of the 2016 film, ‘I, Daniel Blake’. Daniel is a carpenter […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up