All lifetime mortgages have a monthly or annual equivalent rate, the critical factor is what is used to calculate the interest. How the interest rate is compounded – whether this is monthly or annually – will affect the amount of interest rolled up and repaid upon sale of the property.Interest rates on lifetime mortgages need to be illustrated on a consistent basis so customers and advisers can compare like with like. The annual rate – or for those compounding monthly, the annual equivalent rate – is what should be shown in comparative tables. The industry should adopt a uniform approach to this and the most consumer-focussed way of doing it would be to illustrate rates on an annual basis. The following table illustrates this point, taking the example of a mortgage of 75,000 over 15 years: If you decided to take a mortgage on the headline rate advertised by the lenders then lender B in the above example would be the natural choice at 6.15%, but as the table shows this would cost the client 2,114 more in interest over 15 years. The true cost of a lifetime mortgage can only be assessed by comparing APRs and this must be the acid test. Cashback will not be shown in an APR calculation. Other than for marketing purposes, and perhaps the systems capabilities of some lenders, there is little benefit in having a monthly compounded rate. Indeed one could go as far to say that that is misleading and hides the real cost to the consumer. My vote is for an annual rate as the industry standard. This is an area that has often been written about in the past and highlighted as being something advisers should watch out for. The details are often buried deep within the Key Facts Illustrations of providers. In some cases, it is unclear what the interest rate basis is even from the KFI. Looking at the APR gives the best indicator though even this does not necessarily provide enough information as the fees included could be over- contributing to the APR. Ultimately, it is the APR that provides the real comparison, anyway. That said, the issue of a monthly rate as against one being compounded annually cannot be ignored. The actual rate, whether calculated monthly or annually, is not the point. The important thing is how clear this is to the adviser and the consumer. Rates can easily be converted to show how they compare. But if all rates were displayed on a like for like basis it would make life easier for everybody. Our advisers are provided with clear comparisons of all the available rates so that they can see the real basis the provider uses, and also the annualised rates for those that are monthly. The only reason for having a monthly charging method is to deflate the headline figure to make it look more competitive. By now I would have expected lenders to have started to move away from this tactic. It is ultimately the consumer who may be misled by lower looking monthly compound rates and thus make the wrong choice. Now is the time for lenders to agree to show rates in a uniform way to make life easier for everybody. Researching this market is tough enough as it is.
Speaking at the Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Associations annual dinner last night, chairman Tim Dawson called on the Financial Services Authority to review the Mortgage Conduct of Business.Dawson says: “The FSA with the help of the industry should take the opportunity in 2006 to undertake a review into the workings of MCOB, looking at ways it […]
Abbey launches a new two-year fixed rate mortgage today, exclusively forintermediaries, at just 4.29%.The product, which is available to remortgagers only, has a 499 fee that can be added to the loan. Highlights include 75% loan to value, and the remortgage solution package includes free valuation for mortgage purposes (max 1,100) and free legal fees, […]
Following its marketing team restructure, Mortgage 2002 has appointed Lynne Rees as head of corporate communications. The role will involve the orchestration of all PR for all areas of the Mortgage 2000 proposition. Rees has been with the company for over six years, and will continue to report directly to Sean Hornsby, managing director, in […]
Plans for a revaluation of council tax in England have been postponed, the government announced today. The government has instead extended Sir Michael Lyons’ inquiry into local government funding, so that he can consider issues relating to the wider functions of local government and its future role. The extension of Sir Michael’s is intended to […]
By Kunal Desai, Manager of Neptune India Fund Kunal Desai recently celebrated his third anniversary as manager of the Neptune India Fund. Kunal has built a strong track record of outperformance since he assumed responsibility for the Fund, delivering a return of 30.3 per cent ompared to the MSCI India Index gain of just 14.0 […]
News and expert analysis straight to your inboxSign up