View more on these topics

A&L in proc fee bribery accusation

Alliance & Leicester has been accused of bribing brokers by offering a 1% proc fee to sell a “wholly uncompetitive” 10-year base rate tracker deal.

The move comes less than a week after the FSA set out proposals designed to stop high-pressure selling, excessive charges and lenders offering excessive inducements to intermediaries.

The A&L product launched on Friday last week and starts at a flat Bank of England base rate for year one, BBR plus 0.5% for year two, then BBR plus 1.5% for years three to 10, reverting to basic variable rate for the remaining term. Available up to 95% LTV the deal carries redemption penalties for the first three years of six months&#39 gross interest on any amounts repaid. Most mainstream lenders, including A&L, offer proc fees between 0.25% to 0.35% – way below the 1% offered by A&L for this deal only.

Ray Boulger, senior technical manager at Charcol, says: “Over even three years, let alone 10, this is a wholly uncompetitive deal. Year one is just about OK, but, in reality, it is a two-year deal with trailer penalites for the further year.”

And one broker, who asked not to be named, adds: “Obviously A&L think it has enough brokers that are sufficiently amoral to accept the bribe of 1%. This is stooping to the murkiest deaths of the sub-prime market and the unsecured loan market where the level of commission depends on how big an interest rate the broker can get away with. Coming in the week when CP146 was published, this is unbelievable. Where&#39s the consumer protection?” Michael Bolton, head of mortgage marketing at BM Solutions, says: “It&#39s stretching the credulilty of mortgage brokers. It&#39s beyond belief in the current climate – especially in the run up to regulation.”

Andy Homer, spokesman for A&L, says: “This is a test product to assess the appetite for longer-term products and the proc fee was set at this level to create awareness among IFAs. Advisers will provide customers with the best product for their needs. If this offer is not appropriate it won&#39t sell. We believe that it is an attractive offer.”

Recommended

You never said why

From Shaun GodfreyThe publication of CP146 and RAO is extremely welcome because it will give all those firms involved in providing mortgage advice a fantastic opportunity to influence the future of the marketplace. We will be reviewing the 350-page document and asking our membership for their views prior to a formal submission. However, at first […]

Construction and property lead demand for bank lending

Demand for bank finance from construction and property companies has outstripped other sectors according to latest statistics from the British Bankers&#39 Association (BBA). The BBA&#39s annual review, Banking Business, shows that the pattern of demand from companies for bank finance has shifted in recent years, with lending to construction and property companies more than doubling […]

FSA considers scheme

The FSA is considering several ways of implementing the appointed representative regime to mortgage advice, despite fears it could restrict consumer choice in the market place. Under the new regime, brokers will have to choose between direct FSA authorisation and appointed representative status, where an authorised firm will take responsibility for compliance. CP146 indicates there […]

New IMA extranet for mortgage intermediaries

The Independent Mortgage Adviser Network has launched its new extranet to IMA members. Housed in one easy-to-use environment, advisers can access the latest marketing support, regulatory requirements, lender developments and even track cases on line. The marketing area provides members with current industry news and promotional support such as adverts, mailshots and editorials. To keep […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up