View more on these topics

Solicitors and valuers will be held to ransom

From Danny Lovey

The government&#39s proposals on the house purchase process are supposed to improve matters and simplify the system. We are all aware that the current system is far from perfect but consider for a moment the potential ramifications of the government&#39s proposals.

The theory goes that a pack will be prepared that will include a surveyor&#39s report and legal documentation, will cost the seller £500-£600 to prepare, and after that everything will be simple.

But why should a lender accept a report that will be out of date by the time a property is sold? The lenders now insist on the valuation of a property on its current value in real time. Why should they trust any old Tom, Dick or Harry when they go to great lengths to use people they have confidence in and who are on their approved panels? And what happens when a seller does not find a buyer for a few months and the market has moved during that time? To force lenders into having to take any old valuer&#39s report when they have not appointed them is tantamount to taking away their choice regarding a commercial decision that they will have to make.

And what happens when a buyer wishes to have his or her own report prepared?

Caveat emptor springs to mind. Why should they trust something that has been prepared for the vendor? For example, what if the buyer wants a more detailed report – one that sits between a mortgage valuation report and what is currently known as a homebuyer&#39s report – that costs more than the standard mortgage valuation report? It seems to me that there would be an element of double charging here. Currently if a client wishes to have a homebuyer&#39s report, it is done at the same time as the mortgage report and therefore the cost is likely to be, say, £450 instead of £250.

But in the proposed scenario this would have to be paid for again – this time by only the buyer who will thus effectively be double charged because of the need for an additional visit.

I also believe the proposal will lead to anti-competitiveness and cartels. This is already happening. The big groups in the business are discussing how they will tie clients. A major talking point is the cost of the packs – a lot of people either cannot afford the cash or do not wish to pay upfront if they can avoid it. This is human nature.

So groups are forming cartels with the intention of tying in potential vendors by effectively offering to pay for the packs. The offer is &#39we will look after everything for you&#39 which means &#39but one way or another we will make you pay&#39.

In other words, it&#39s code for rip-off. Solicitors and valuers will be played off against each other by these cartels and will be held to ransom if they want to do work for the big boys. Personal service will disappear and buyers will no longer be able to have that cosy chat about legal matters with their solicitors – something that is of value to those making big decisions in their lives – unless their solicitor fits in with the cartels.

The Office of Fair Trading is already looking at the role of tied mortgage companies within estate agents and the intimidation that is sometimes brought to bear to keep potential buyers inhouse. How is the currently proposed legislation going to do anything but encourage this type of practice?

My feeling is that the current system may not be perfect but technology is already speeding things up.

Currently buyers and sellers have choice and that remains important in a process that sees people making the biggest investment that they are likely to make in their lives.

Danny Lovey

The Mortgage Practitioner


By email


GMAC pulls 25-year fixed rate deal

GMAC-RFC has pulled its innovative 25-year fixed rate mortgage, blaming rising swap rates and lack of demand just two months after its launch. Despite garnering publicity in the national press the deal ultimately failed to deliver volume sales. When the product was first released in February it was hoped it would help make longer term […]

Lib Dems criticise rising lending multiples

The Liberal Democrats have warned that consumers are borrowing more on their mortgages than they can afford and many risk finding themselves in negative equity. The party is basing its warning on figures showing one in 10 borrowers have taken out a mortgage loan worth 4 x their salary or more. Vince Cable MP, Liberal […]

Lender accused of elitism

A broker has accused Newcastle of elitism over its refusal to offer its products to all brokers. Chelsea Mortgage Management says it recently contacted the building society with a view to doing business to it but was told that it only introduced to selected brokers, including Savills and Charcol. Simon Bucknell, business development manager at […]

BDS Mortgage Group unveils high net worth tracker deals

BDS Mortgage Group has unveiled a range of exclusive high net worth base rate trackers from BM Solutions. The products have been designed to attract high balance mortgages from high net worth professionals. Loan sizes range from £150,000 to £2m plus with a two-year discount followed by base rate plus 0.85% for the life of […]

Pensions - thumbnail

Mothers missing out on millions

New HMRC figures show number of ‘mothers missing out on millions’ in pension rights has doubled in two years – Steve Webb Figures published on 24th March by HM Revenue & Customs show a doubling in the number of mothers missing out unnecessarily on vital pension rights because of a change in the rules on Child […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up