View more on these topics

BM Solutions and TMW took 80% of the B2L lending market in 2009

Just two lenders accounted for 80% of buy-to-let lending last year, research from Datamonitor shows.

Its report, Buy-to-Let Mortgages And The Rental Sector, shows Lloyds Banking Group’s BM Solutions and Nationwide Building Society’s The Mortgage Works took the lion’s share of gross buy-to-let lending in 2009.

Of the total £8.5bn gross buy-to-let lending advanced last year BM Solutions accounted for some £4.6bn while TMW lent about £2.3bn.

Nigel Terrington, chief executive of The Paragon Group, says: “Buy-to-let lending hit its lowest level since 2001 last year and the market was dominated by just two lenders.

“Investor demand has never been the issue – it’s always been about mortgage finance, which has been restricted since the closure of the wholesale funding markets.”

And a spokesman for the National Landlords Association says: “A lot of lenders got out of the market in 2007 and last year there was a limited supply of mortgage products for any type of landlord, particularly for new entrants.

“But buy-to-let is still a niche product in many ways and I suspect that as the credit markets open up we will see more lenders entering the sector.”

Despite the lack of buy-to-let lenders Datamonitor is confident that the sector will see a boost in the next few years.

The firm estimates that gross buy-to-let lending will stay flat at £8.5bn this year before rising to £15.8bn in 2012, £20.2bn in 2013 and £25.6bn in 2014.

It says a surge in the buy-to-let market will emerge as house prices and rents stabilise, given that buy-to-let arrears are no higher than the rest of the market.

Terrington adds: “A number of socio-economic and demographic factors will drive demand for rented property in the future such as inward migration, the rate of new household formation and the composition of those households, growing student numbers and a greater propensity to rent among young people.”

Recommended

cap_comp.gif
1

CAN YOU HAVE A POP TO WIN THIS BOTTLE OF MIGHTY FINE CHAMPAGNE?

Brian Gibbons, director of Jordans Conveyancing, in a chance encounter with boxing champion Chris Eubank Can you put the boot in to your nearest and dearest to win this super-stylish pen? Submit a witty caption for the photo above and you will be automatically entered into our prize draw. Remember, the funnier it is, the […]

Who cares?

By Tracey Dickson, marketing consultant There are almost 7 million carers in the UK – that’s around 10 per cent of the population who provide unpaid care for a disabled, seriously ill or older loved one.1 But according to a report from the charity Carers UK, 20 per cent of people providing 50 hours or more of care […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
Comments
  • Post a comment
  • Paul 21st May 2010 at 10:35 am

    It now seems that BTL lending is once again being seen as a viable option. There is a shortgage of housing and with thousands forced out of the mortgage market the rental market will flourish. Competition is the key to the BTL sector, as it is with any area of business. The big two have had the monopoly for too long and as a result have been able to dictate terms far too easily. There should not be a situation where a 7% rate is actually better than 3% due to arrangement fees but this has been happening. Charging 3% arrangement fee on a 1 year deal is just not right. Come on lenders get back into the game and give some decent deals to the thousands of landlords out there currently being priced out.

  • Geoff Laird 20th May 2010 at 7:06 pm

    Perhaps more competition within this sector will break the stranglehold by both lenders and make the terms more palatable from a portfolio landlords perspective, the high completion fee does no-one any service