In last week’s edition, Simon Mouncher’s excellent letter was published under the headline, ‘Lenders are preparing to attract business direct from the broker sector’. Tone and content were interesting and stimulating in equal measureWith the onset of regulation it suited some lenders to pontificate on the future of the packager market. Some were more vociferous than others but the column inches the anti-packaging commentators generated was nothing more than speculation. There was not a shred of evidence to suggest the packager market would implode under the burden of regulation and disappear because lenders would not deal with them. Such views would now be seen as hysterical. What did those who were convinced packagers would not survive think would happen to the production worth many billions each year? Who would package and market the cases? With 12 months elapsed since statutory regulation, the only hysteria now to be heard is in the accumulated laughter of packagers that are still here, still in business and doing record volumes. This outcome does not mean the packaging sector can afford to be complacent. Indeed all sectors of the industry, whether packager, intermediary or lender, must guard against complacency. Together we must deal with the challenges ahead. Industries are littered with cases where external change has altered the business environment to such an extent that once accepted paradigms no longer hold good. My colours have always been firmly nailed to the mast in support of packagers. I have written in this column on a number of occasions in support of the market. In fact, last time was at the height of anti-packaging hysteria in the early Autumn of 2004. Those who sat on the sidelines and sniped then were wrong. The reason they were so wrong is that they used the smokescreen of regulation to distance themselves from a distribution channel that, for reasons that have never been clear to me, they no longer wanted to use. Now, packagers are in rude health and ready to face the commercial challenges ahead. I will take this opportunity to respond to Mouncher’s call to arms. At Infinity, what is crucial is the choice the intermediary has who they package with. The broker has two choices – send us an unpackaged case or use a packager. We support both routes but predominately deal with brokers direct. We are not turning our backs on any distribution channel. You can’t say fairer than that. Simon biddle
- Top trends
Advisers operating a multi-tie proposition alongside whole of market advice expect to be able to write business more profitably at less cost, says Sesame. The findings come as Sesame announces that over 500 advisers have signed up to its Sesame Select proposition in the first two months since its operational launch. Based on Sesames experience […]
Mortgages Direct, the financial subsidiary of Spicerhaart, has revealed that more borrowers are continuing to opt for fixed rate deals because they arent convinced low level of interest rates will hold.Research from Mortgages Direct shows 96% of borrowers opt for fixed rate deals of two to five years. Peter Gladdy, director of Mortgages Direct, says: […]
A poll by Deloitte & Touche ranks Trigold as the fastest-growing technology company in the south of England. Trigold tops the 2005 Deloitte Technology Fast 50, a ranking of the 50 fastest-growing technology companies in what it calls the London and Southern region. Rankings are based on average percentage revenue growth over five years from […]
Flower director Trevor Youens is leaving the company to join Home Information Pack specialist the Live Organisation, at the end of this month.Youens has been with Flower for four years but says it is now time to move on, and will be joining the Live Organisation, part of the First Title Group, as director in […]
Johnson Fleming has received the ISO 22301 accreditation, which demonstrates the company’s ability to effectively understand and prioritise the threats to the business.
News and expert analysis straight to your inboxSign up