View more on these topics

Exit fees debacle could have long-term effects

So, the cat is out of the bag. The deadline has come and gone and the exit fee debacle is over. Well, not really.

Those lenders that shamelessly hiked their fees put the industry under pressure.

Consumer groups and campaigning parties have been able to strike an easy blow at the soft underbelly of UK mortgage lending as a result.

So what happened? Lenders upset tens of thousands of customers – some of them long-term clients – by overcharging exit fees. This wound up the national press and gave it the opportunity to put the boot in.

The guilty firms continued to break the law to the extent that the Office of Fair Trading waded in. This eventually triggered a Financial Services Authority review. You couldn’t make it up.

When all is said and done, this huge mess was created over a piddling sum of about 200 per client. In reality, this is a small amount compared with the overall cost of mortgage borrowing.

But what evoked the ire of customers was the principle. See it from their point of view. They pay hundreds of thousands of pounds over 25 years or more for their mortgages. But before getting hold of the title deeds they are charged exit fees much higher than they expected.

Thanks to some deft handling by the Council of Mortgage Lenders, a good old-fashioned British compromise was brokered between all parties.

When the lenders’ Simon biddle responses were sent to the regulator, the transgressors crumbled, one by one.

So the naughty len-ders are left with the onerous task of compensating those customers who overpaid exit fees. The potential cost of this reimbursement is huge. If I were a shareholder in those businesses I would want to see heads on poles. Their next AGMs should be interesting.

More worryingly, the public relations ripples created by this abuse affect the whole market. The affair has been damaging to the industry’s standing. This could result in a further erosion of consumer confidence, which might have a lasting and highly damaging residual effect. Only time will tell.

But one thing is clear. Many respected lenders have let the side down. They must tighten their internal controls to ensure this sort of thing never happens again.

Recommended

I must have provoked C&G’s wrath by asking for updates

In light of the FSA’s Treating Customers Fairly initiative, might I also suggest a Treating Brokers Fairly rule? If there was such an initiative, Cheltenham & Gloucester would be at the top of my list for investigation. Five weeks after applying to C&G (26% LTV and no further documents or information needed) an offer emerged. […]

IVA firm’s shares tumble

Debt Free Direct’s shares took a sharp downturn last week after it admitted profits for 2007 would be down due to deteriorating advertising performance.

Countrywide cuts dead weight

Countrywide has chosen to end its remortgage conveyancing operation and its Spanish overseas estate agency, H2O homes.The estate agency, which recently accepted a buyout offer from US equity firm Apollo Management, reported profits of £113.8m in 2006 as it plans to reshuffle its national and international business.It also reported a 24% increase in turnover from […]

5D in service link with Crown

5D Finance has appointed Crown Mortgage Management as its servicing partner. 5D will continue to process applications inhouse through to completion and Crown will administer completed loans.

The curse of long-term cash

Trevor Greetham, Head of Multi Asset at Royal London Asset Management, reveals why clients should be seriously concerned when short-term holdings of cash turn into a long-term investment. There is nothing wrong with holding wealth in the form of cash on a short-term basis. For many people capital stability is important and access to ready cash […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up