View more on these topics

Treasury takes CAB to different level

The Citizens&#39 Advice Bureaux, money advice centres and charities will not fall within the regulated mortgage regime as they are not carried on “by way of business”.

While many respondents to the latest consultation on mortgage regulation agreed that money advice agencies should not be regulated in principle, some say a specific exclusion will have to be written into the legislation.

The Treasury acknowledges that it “cannot say categorically that all money advice centres, the Citizens&#39 Advice Bureaux, charities and so on are not carrying on the activity by way of business as this will depend on the circumstances in each individual case”.

But it refutes the need for a dedicated exemption, saying that factors such as whether clients pay for advice “points to the Citizens&#39 Advice Bureaux and others not being caught even without a separate exclusion”.

Factors taken into account include whether a person provides a service without any expectation of reward or payment; whether clients pay for the advice; whether the individuals giving it are paid; the frequency with which the activity is carried on and whether the body advertises its services.

Some respondents stressed that consumers should receive advice from competent regulated advisers and that many people who used such organisations were vulnerable.

Mike Fry, director of Widnes-based Halton Insurance Service, says: “You cannot be an oracle. People go into the CAB with umpteen different questions. Most people who go are not very switched on and giving the CAB staff carte blanche to advise people technically is not right.”

But Simon Bottery, spokesman for the National Association of Citizens&#39 Advice Bureaux, says: “We support the Treasury&#39s decision. We responded to the consultation along these lines and understood that it was not the government&#39s intention to regulate the CAB anyway. It seems that it has come to the right conclusion.”

Recommended

Repent sinners

From Frank HughesIan Griffiths&#39 letter about Abbey National (Mortgage Strategy August 5 2002) did strike a chord with me. I&#39ve not been wild about Abbey National since, admittedly a few years back, I lost over £2,000 in fees and commissions as a result of its incompetence.An established self-employed client was moving from High Wycombe to […]

Royal Bank of Scotland profits up 15%

The Royal Bank of Scotland Group has reported a 15% increase in profit in its half-year results, although bad debt provisions soared 77% compared to the first six months of 2001. Nonetheless, the group&#39s results are solid overall and went some way to ease fears about bad debts in the UK banking sector. RBoS profits […]

CIS tells borrowers not to overstretch

As house prices continue to increase faster than income rises can keep pace, Co-operative Insurance Services is warning frustrated borrowers to think carefully before stretching their income multiples too far. An increasing number of lenders are offering four and five times people&#39s salary and beginning to stretch to 110% mortgages in an attempt to plug […]

A taxing problem

From Dr Mark BlakeyRecent letters on buy-to-let propositions have debated some interesting fundamentals. Sohan Jheeta (Mortgage Strategy, July 1 2002) talks about interest on capital raised for commercial purposes being treated as an allowable expense that reduces the taxable income on rent received.What wasn&#39t mentioned though, and I would be interested to hear from others […]

'Feeling the Squeeze'

Royal London carried out a UK wide survey with 2,500 consumers age 35-44 over the summer. The survey found that over a third, 34 per cent, said their finances felt Squeezed and so were struggling to meet day-to-day expenses, despite 87 per cent being aware that they need to save more. However, the survey did […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up