View more on these topics

Help to Buy means getting details right


Almost two weeks on, the dust is finally starting to settle following the announcement of Chancellor George Osborne’s housing proposals in his Budget and the two-headed Help to Buy.

There is still an awful lot of detail to get straight so any welcome which is given to the scheme has to be qualified with the dreaded phrase “The devil is in the detail”.

I think what we are seeing here is a reaffirmation that this Government is happy to back the principle of home-ownership, that great British aspiration ingrained in our national psyche since the early days of Margaret Thatcher.

Also that they want to see an increase in the number of housing transactions as an important ingredient in economic recovery. Previous Government ideas have tended to be more focused on the more direct economic stimulus provided by new building. This goal is still clearly important as the expansion and transformation of FirstBuy demonstrates.

But the objective of the second limb of Help to Buy, the mortgage guarantee element, should increase the supply of low deposit mortgages. Lenders will be entering the scheme voluntarily and few have committed themselves to participation whilst so many details – including the cost of accessing the scheme – remain opaque.

Those who do should be able to make more mortgages available at LTVs between 80 and 95 per cent, allowing borrowers to get on the housing ladder earlier and spend less time saving for their deposit. Lenders should benefit from some form of capital relief – although this is not a done deal – and from putting aside less capital to cover their higher LTV loans to reflect the nature of the Government guarantee. This should appeal to funding markets, prudential regulators, and internal risk committees. But these loans will have to pass responsible lending criteria, a good defence against excessive borrowing.

There is a lot of work to do and a January 2014 start date is an ambitious target. If we get the scheme details right, then it might just be the spark for a more active housing market; provided we can avoid the Curse of the Unintended Consequence.


New look, same old taste

So, farewell to the FSA. It took charge of regulating the UK mortgage market on 29 October 2004 and under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 had four main objectives – maintaining market confidence, promoting public understanding of the financial system, securing the appropriate degree of protection of consumers and fighting financial crime. On […]

Montlake Andrew MS blog 150


We should start by saying a big hello – “Hello” – to the Financial Conduct Authority, and goodbye, farewell, auf weidersein, adieu to the dear old FSA. We have had some laughs, some good times, more than a few tears, a couple of scandals and the odd falling out but time moves on. There have […]

Frexit & contagion risk in Europe

Many commentators have suggested the UK’s exit from the European Union will trigger a domino effect, leading to its eventual break-up. Neptune Head of European Equities Rob Burnett discusses the likelihood of this happening. Click here to read more Important informationInvestment risks Neptune funds may have a high historic volatility rating and past performance is […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
  • Post a comment
  • Martin Tapper 6th April 2013 at 11:13 am

    There is an immediate unintended consequence; I have an FTB client who is saying he wants to defer purchasing until he can get support for his purchase. He has all required to proceed immediately, but wants to see if he can buy bigger.
    The delay in establishing the detail might actually have some effect of DEPRESSING demand in the South East which has been a relatively bouyant FTB market.

  • Jonathan Mayall 5th April 2013 at 2:01 pm

    Help to homebuy, if advisers are confused, what hope to members of the public ? Does anyone know what exactly is happening in January 2014 ?