View more on these topics

MS Leader: FSA mustn’t waver on advice

Since the last Mortgage Market Review consultation paper in December there has been disquiet among lenders about the Financial Services Authority’s stance on advice.

The regulator outlined plans to remove the non-advised sales process and said all sales should be advised where there is any interaction between advisers and clients – no matter whether it’s over the phone, face-to-face, social media or live chats online.

Execution-only would be effectively banned, bar for high net worth and professional borrowers who have a background in finance, and for postal and internet sales where there is no interaction with the lender other than transacting the deal.

This was a hallelujah moment for brokers. As the FSA says, if consumers go to a lender’s branch and speak to an adviser, they believe they’ve been given advice, even if the lender insists they haven’t. It confuses consumers and the FSA was right to dump it.

But it will have major consequences for lenders financially, with increased training posing a headache. So it was hardly surprising to see both the Council of Mortgage Lenders and Building Societies Association protect their respective members’ interests last week with their responses to the consultation paper.

The BSA lambasted the MMR for being broker-centric and the CML claimed it will add one hour 42 minutes to the whole process, with lenders facing reduced sales or, God forbid, using brokers. Irrespective of the fact that brokers could potentially gain a lot from this scenario, the concept of enshrining advice as something all consumers have a right to expect is a good one.

The trade bodies have said their pieces, but we can only hope that when it comes to axing non-advised sales, the regulator ignores the banks’ financial considerations and sticks to its guns.


Demand sees Skipton pull 95% deals

Skipton Building Society has temporarily pulled out of 95% LTV lending. The lender entered the 95% LTV market in March last year but says it has temporarily withdrawn products due to unexpected demand.Skipton initially offered a single product through subsidiary Connells. Before its withdrawal it offered two 95% LTV products – a three-year and a […]

Shadow MPC – April

With the eurozone likely to deliver zero growth, and Spain and Italy struggling, the UK has shown that if left alone it can manage its financial challenges. But to keep our heads above the water it’s wise for the base rate to remain at 0.5%

Enness strikes deal with estate agent

Enness Private Clients has signed a referral agreement with London estate agency Benham & Reeves to handle its customers’ mortgage enquiries. The partnership will see Benham & Reeves introduce mortgage and finance enquiries from customers to Enness. Benham & Reeves has offices in four north London areas – Hampstead, Highgate, Dartmouth Park and West Hampstead […]

How to use wills to protect your clients’ wishes

By Ross Jackson, senior protection marketing manager March is Free Wills Month! Free Wills Month brings together a group of well-respected charities to offer members of the public aged 55 and over the opportunity to have their simple wills written or updated free of charge by using participating solicitors in selected locations around England and Wales. Research […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
  • Post a comment
  • c jones 4th April 2012 at 2:50 pm

    Not one broker comment on this article? The outcome of this consultation will probably be one of the biggest things to affect advisers across the country. Perhaps advisers have so little faith in the FSA doing the right thing that they dont even waste their time commenting anymore. Personally i fully expect no improvement in advisers circumstances and a climb down by the FSA to protect the big lenders interests. customers will continue to fall onto whatever product the lenders give them as long as it sounds cheap to start with and the board of directors of the large lenders will continue to live in luxury at everyone elses expense. It is not in the interests of the FSA or any of the big banks to make such sweeping changes so what exactly makes anyone think this change will happen. After all the FSA has no concept of properly regulating a market (RBS? HBOS?) and the banks couldnt care less about their customers (PPI, unfair bank charges). Ill continue to dream the dream along with everyone else but I also have one eye open to reality.