View more on these topics

FCA: The dos and don’ts of internal investigations

FCA logo new 3 620x430

Allowing firms to investigate potential misconduct does not mean businesses are “marking their own homework”, says the FCA.

Speaking at a Pinsent Masons conference in London yesterday, FCA director of investigations Jamie Symington discussed the circumstances in which it is acceptable for firms to carry out their own investigations.

He said it has long been common for firms to carry out investigations when things go wrong – either by themselves or commissioned to a third party – on their own initiative or through agreement with the FCA.

But he said such investigations can become “problematic” where there is also the possibility of action by the regulator. In such cases, he said it is imperative that any internal review does not prejudice the FCA’s investigation.

Symington said: “We recognise firms understand their own businesses and have access to systems and data, so should be best placed to examine what has happened when problems arise. But in some cases, such as criminal investigations, internal reviews have no place at all.”

He added: “Internal investigations need to be better understood if there is to be confidence in our enforcement responsibilities. For example, in media commentary on one of our recent cases this practice was characterised as firms being allowed to mark their own homework.

“If internal investigations are to play a useful role, clearly the regulator cannot, and cannot be seen to, naively accept firms’ conclusions. And let me be absolutely clear, that is not how we work.”

Symington said a firm planning to carry out an internal review must first decide whether it is appropriate to notify the regulator.

Other crucial factors in determining whether an investigation is appropriate are for the investigation to be sufficiently independent, and for the firm to be transparent with the FCA.

He said typical points the FCA would seek to establish with a firm planning to carry out an internal review include: to what extent will the regulator have access to the underlying evidence, how will evidence be recorded and retained, and timescales.

Symington said the FCA often clashes with firms over legal privilege, claiming some firms deliberately try to “game” the system to withhold information.

He said: “One of the most common areas of dispute is firms’ interviews with employees.

“Sometimes there is only lawyers’ notes of such interviews: no recordings or notes by others. Then firms may claim legal privilege because the notes have been made by lawyers.

“This looks to us like a gaming process in order to shroud important evidence in legal privilege. We find that particularly unhelpful and particularly unwelcome.”

He said some firms have also suggested that to avoid legal privilege they can only read the output of an investigation aloud to the FCA, and not provide it in writing.

Symington said: “That is absolutely absurd. If a regulated firm wishes to share information with us, there should be no question it should be done properly and in a transparent manner with a proper record.

“The public would find it absurd that a firm would read something aloud but not provide a copy, or show us something and then yank it back.”



Bank of England maintains interest rates

The Bank of England has maintained interest rates at 0.5 per cent and has kept its monetary easing program unchanged. The Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee voted 8-1 to maintain rates, with Ian McCafferty once again being the only dissenter, who wanted to raise rates by 25 basis points. The committee voted unanimously to keep the asset purchase […]


Shawbrook increases gross lending by 27%

Shawbrook Bank increased gross lending 27 per cent year-on-year in the first nine months of 2015. The FTSE 250 bank advanced £1.2bn to customers as at the end of September, across commercial mortgages, second charge and asset finance. This compares to around £950m in the equivalent period of 2014. Net lending increased 23 per cent […]


‘Bridging market could more than double in four years’

The bridging market could more than double in the next four years to £7bn, industry experts predict. The West One Bridging index puts the current size of the market at just under £3bn annually, a jump of 200 per cent from 2012 when it was worth less than £1bn per year. Enterprise Finance chief executive […]

Editor’s note: Lenders must act now on older borrowers

The past few years have been difficult for older borrowers looking for a mortgage, with the emphasis on affordability, mainly as a result of the Mortgage Market Review, leading to a drastic reduction in the number of options for these people. The Council of Mortgage Lenders says that now over a third of mortgages being […]

Life cover for life

Jennifer Gilchrist Proposition Lead – Design, Royal London When someone mentions whole of life plans, most people will think of a niche product that serves as an inheritance tax planning tool for high-net-worth clients. And it’s really not surprising they’ve been pigeonholed in that way because before the arrival of RDR in 2013, that’s more […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Why register with Mortgage Strategy?

Mortgage Strategy continues to be the market-leading B2B mortgage publication in the UK, and provides trusted, independent insight with the aim of helping, promoting and analysing the latest developments for mortgage professionals.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Mortgage Strategy Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, webinars and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Mortgage Strategy's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now