View more on these topics

Buy-to-letwatch: Landlord tax relief

If landlords lose their tax relief in the Budget on 8 July, it will make buy-to-let as an investment proposition much less attractive 


Just as this issue of Mortgage Strategy is published, a seismic change may be about to take place within the buy-to-let industry – one that could have catastrophic consequences.

As I write, we are approaching the second Budget of the year. Following the Conservatives’ surprising outright victory at the general election in May – marking the end of the coalition government – Chancellor George Osborne announced he was planning a second Budget, for 8 July, in which he would reveal a new economic strategy for the country. One of the issues that may be addressed in that Budget is landlord tax relief.

While no one has explicitly said that tax relief will be a focus of the Budget, there is growing speculation that it will be, with Osborne due to announce where his planned £12bn of tax cuts will come from.

At present, landlords can deduct mortgage interest from their products and, as such, pay less tax. This relief can produce a considerable saving and, if the Government has indeed earmarked this as a way to make cuts, it is understandable that it has come to that conclusion.

However, once again I fear this is an example of how politics and the mortgage industry should not mix. I have said frequently that the Government does not fully understand our industry and, particularly, buy-to-let.

This has been apparent on many occasions. An example is landlords checking the immigration status of tenants, which was suggested a couple of years ago by the coalition. Thankfully this suggestion remained just that but it clearly showed how politicians failed to understand how the market operated and how implausible it would be for such plans to be implemented.

If landlords lose their tax break, it will make buy-to-let as an investment proposition much less attractive. If letting a property, or a portfolio of properties – which takes hard work and commitment – were to become less profitable or even costly for landlords, why would they continue to do it?

Many good landlords would exit the market and the PRS sector would suffer. While some people may believe that this would make more properties available for first-time buyers, it would not. Investors buying properties to let are not the major barrier to first-time buyers that they are made out to be; mortgage funding is. All we would see is the PRS sector becoming contracted and those people who desperately needed quality rental accommodation losing out.

Let’s hope the speculation that landlord tax breaks will be cancelled proves to be incorrect.



Paul Smee

Analysis: H2B 2 has proved the media wrong

Housing boom fears were a recurring narrative in the media during the lead-up to the Help to Buy mortgage guarantee launch. So it was interesting 18 months on, during the election – in which housing was a big issue – that we heard barely a mention of it. Most party manifestos declared they would be […]

Paul Nye

60 Seconds with… Paul Nye, director of business partnerships, Stonebridge Group

How will you use the new investment from Shepherd Direct to boost your proposition? Stonebridge has achieved market-leading growth in recent years and our strategy remains unchanged. The success of the network will continue to be built around core principles of low charging, low risk-taking, business investment, innovation, quality staff and a market-leading mortgage and […]


Budget: ‘Populist’ cut to landlord tax relief not a ‘great leveller’

The Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association has labelled the Chancellor’s cut to buy-to-let tax relief a “populist” measure that will not be a “great levelling of the playing field” for homeowners. In his Budget speech today, George Osborne said the higher rate of mortgage interest relief would be withdrawn gradually over a four-year period from April […]


Cover story: Mutually exclusive?

Nationwide gets high scores in surveys and is generally well regarded by brokers but can it still claim to be a mutual when its operational attributes are mostly those of banks?

Pension savings-2015

Overseas transfer charge

By Jim Grant, Senior Product Insight & Technical Support Analyst, Royal London Transfers to overseas pension schemes are not recognised transfers unless the transfer is to a Qualifying Recognised Overseas Pension Scheme (QROPS). A transfer to an overseas pension scheme that isn’t a QROPS is therefore an unauthorised payment and taxed accordingly. However, even if the […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
  • Post a comment
  • opus appleby 13th July 2015 at 12:24 pm

    Im pleased to say it was introduced…with the number of properties some of these greedy people own it is a fallacy to say it doesn’t affect first time buyers.