View more on these topics

Buy-to-let Watch: Policymakers should gain understanding of B2L before meddling

Ying-Tan-MS-CUTOUT-250x255.jpgI have been writing this column for a long time now and while I have addressed many issues one running theme that has cropped up on countless occasions is that too much intervention, both political and regulatory, can be damaging for buy-to-let.

The reason I have made this point so much is because the Government, the Bank of England and the regulator have all attempted to get involved in the sector in ways that, in some cases, would have done more harm than good.

There are plenty of examples that spring to mind. For example, a couple of years ago the government announced plans to make landlords responsible for checking the immigration status of potential tenants (a job that was seemingly not being done by border control). Despite protestation from much of the industry and, what seemed like, a reprieve for some time, the initiative is expected to go ahead this year as part of the Home Office’s Right to Rent scheme.

Then, of course, there is the ongoing threat of regulation. Ask within the industry and many will tell you BTL is a business and thus should have different rules to the residential sector. Regulators appear to have a view that all landlords are naïve and need protecting when, as those working on the front line will attest, they are actually savvy and professional business people who need flexibility and innovation, not red tape.

The regulator is, of course, pressing ahead with what it calls “consumer regulation”, which is welcomed. But how long before the rest of the market is targeted?

There is also the much-maligned reduction in landlord tax relief announced in Osborne’s summer Budget that will do more than cause unnecessary hassle within the industry. In fact, it will undoubtedly see many landlords leave.

I was therefore very pleased to read the Council of Mortgage Lenders supports my opinion and has issued a warning to policymakers that applying too much control could damage a market so important for the private rented sector.

Such outside involvement is occurring because there is an unfounded belief BTL is out of control and needs stabilising when really nothing of the kind is happening. Indeed, we are still almost £20bn off where we were in 2007 in terms of lending figures. With the market expected to hit £30bn in 2015 we will still be a long way off the peaks of £45bn. I am confident that given the environment we operate in this is good clean business.

The CML is urging the Government and other authorities to “consider the effects of uncertainty on the market and, in particular, the potential for a series of reforms to have cumulative, unintended and perhaps damaging consequences”.

I would go one step further and encourage the authorities to gain a deeper understanding of the industry before attempting to meddle in it.



Leader: Let’s lead the way on equality

When the topic of diversity is raised in any industry, it often provokes a defensive response. The women we spoke to for this week’s cover feature had some shocking tales of chauvinism and debauchery from the pre-credit crunch era but, thankfully, the consensus is that the worst excesses of those days are behind us. However, […]

Andrew Montlake-Coreco

Market Watch: MPC losing credibility with confusing rate messages

With many accusing the Federal Reserve of bottling a rate rise decision, I think it is a bit unfair to ask them to totally ignore issues such as China, which have threatened to blow world markets off course. They also seem a little more concerned than most about the possibility of raising rates and then […]

Japan Economic Insight

James Dowey, Chief Economist, and Paul Caruana-Galizia, Economist

The conventional wisdom is that following a roughly 50 per cent rise in the stock market in 2013 in Yen terms, the Japan trade is over and done*. So the story goes, those big gains were due to a one-off boost from quantitative easing (QE) and a depreciation of the Yen — policies that one should think of as a palliative to Japan’s economic weakness, but not a cure. Rather the cure, and by implication the necessary condition for a longer-term investment case, is deep structural reforms — a painstaking re-weaving of Japan’s economic and social fabric, no less. The story continues: this is a much tougher test than launching a blast of QE, and one that prime minister Shinzo Abe, although well intentioned and well supported by the public thus far, is likely to fail. Stick a fork in Japan, it’s done…continue reading


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up