View more on these topics

Buy-to-Let Watch: Are PRA rules worth the time of day?


While much has been said about the impact of PRA rules on investors, the impact on lenders has not been fully addressed

We have all discussed the Prudential Regulation Authority’s plans for tighter lending criteria in buy-to-let, but I was interested to see a recent newspaper article focused on one area in particular: landlords with multiple properties.

Under the new rules, if a landlord with four or more properties wants to refinance one or purchase a new property, they will have to submit mortgage details and income information to the lender for every property they own.

As the newspaper article rightly points out, this means that, if a landlord has 10 properties in his portfolio, the lender will have to review each of them and assess mortgages and income on all 10 – clearly a time-consuming task.

Time is money

Indeed, while much has been said about the impact of PRA regulation on property investors, the impact on lenders has not been fully addressed. Time is money, as they say – and, if lenders have to spend lengthy periods on each buy-to-let case, those perhaps less dedicated to our sector may bow out.

Click on image to enlarge

Specialist lenders have much more experience in complex cases, so are no doubt more used to taking a little longer with each client. But if buy-to-let is not your bread and butter, will it make good financial sense to have a member of staff spend so much time assessing each customer?

I sincerely hope this does not happen, because choice and variety are what makes this market so forward thinking and accessible.

Little impact

What we can say, however, is that these changes should have little impact on property investors’ ability to get a mortgage. As my knowledgeable peer, Steve Olejnik of Mortgages for Business, points out in the newspaper article in question, specialist lenders already employ robust underwriting standards. Although the proposed new process may be a little lengthier, short of being somewhat frustrating for landlords it should not affect too much their ability to complete on a deal.

Now, with just a few weeks of this year left, could buy-to-let perhaps stay out of the news for a change?

Ying Tan is managing director of Buy to Let Club



The Mortgage Works in direct-to-consumer BTL pilot

The Mortgage Works is planning to launch a direct-to-consumer channel and no longer sell its products exclusively through brokers. TMW, the Nationwide Group’s buy-to-let arm, has been broker-only since its launch. The firm has been piloting a direct arm over the last year, it has emerged. A Nationwide spokeswoman says: “The Mortgage Works (TMW), part […]


Nationwide H1 profits slip to £696m as commercial real estate arm axed

Nationwide’s half-year profits before tax fell 13 per cent to £696m and the firm will close its Commercial Real Estate arm due to Brexit fallout. At the end of September last year the firm’s profits were £802m. Nationwide says the profit drop is due to record low interest rates, stiff competition in the mortgage market […]


Coventry for Intermediaries launches 1.84% five-year fix

Coventry for Intermediaries has launched its lowest ever five-year fixed rate at 1.84 per cent. The residential loan is available at 50 per cent LTV. It has a £999 product fee. The lender has also introduced a five-year fix at 3.05 per cent at 90 per cent LTV with no product fee. Coventry for Intermediaries […]

Pensions - thumbnail

Changes to capped drawdown tables

The tables used for capped drawdown maximum income calculations have been updated. We look at the reasons for the change and what the impact could be. Changes to capped drawdown tables Capped income drawdown involves taking a pension directly from a fund instead of buying an annuity. However, there’s a limit on the maximum amount […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
  • Post a comment
  • Colin Cloy 28th November 2016 at 4:47 pm

    Ying the BTL mortgage market is bound to stay out of the news for at least the next decade and hopefully for ever as it “withers on the vine” due to David Cameron and George Osborne’s removal of the £15 billion a year tax subsidy to landlords.