View more on these topics

Bridging Watch: Refurb clients are good prospects

The purposes for property refurbishment are extensive and bridging can be the flexible friend that enables it to happen

Refurbishment is a key area of demand for bridging loans. Increasing numbers of people recognise the money to be made from the refurbishment of a property – and the value a short-term bridging loan can add, providing funds for the work ahead of a sale or a refinancing onto a longer-term loan.

Refurbishment can range from a new kitchen to a complete overhaul of a property. Increasingly, there is a need for funds for a change of use.

Since the change in planning legislation a couple of years ago, more developers are changing former offices into residential accommodation, while the trend to refurbish for buy-to-let continues, despite the stamp duty increases. Sometimes this is just sprucing up a property to enable it to be let; other times it is transforming it into an HMO to let to multiple people.

The purposes for refurbishment are extensive and bridging can be the flexible friend that enables it to happen.

Ideal customer

From a broker’s point of view, the person carrying out a refurbishment for BTL is the ideal customer because it can mean multiple repeat business.

First the short-term loan needs to be arranged to provide the funds for the refurbishment. In a second bite at the cherry, many developers usually convert that into a long-term loan once the work is complete. Regardless of whether they do that or sell the property, they may go on to develop other properties and so are likely to need the service of a broker for further loans or mortgages. The broker who understands bridging and does a great job on the first bridging loan could find the client turns into a very good long-term prospect.

It may seem obvious why a bridging lender would also want to lend to such a client. As long as the borrower knows what they are doing and is putting their own funds into the redevelopment, refurbishment presents a good risk. In some cases a lender will lend at higher LTVs, knowing that the LTV will reduce during the refurbishment as the property’s capital value increases. It is therefore always worth a broker’s while to speak to the lender directly and not take the published LTV as read.

A lender is more likely to stretch the LTV if it has worked with the broker previously or with the borrower on a successful project. It can be confident that either or both know what they are doing.

This is important because the risk for the lender comes if the borrower does not complete all the required works before the end of the term; or if they run out of funds, either because the refurbishment has taken longer than expected or because they have found problems they didn’t expect. These can be mitigated but it is important for the lender to do its due diligence on both the borrower and the project. A good broker who knows their client and what they do plays a valuable part.

At Hope Capital, we always look for borrowers with a proven record on property refurbishment. We ensure they have undertaken a number of projects in that area and have a team behind them who know what they are doing.

A good lender will then monitor how the agreed works are progressing at every stage of the development; it will also build milestones into the loan agreement to keep the borrower to a timescale for completion.

Unexpected issues

Of course, there are occasions where unexpected issues are found. If the lender has kept on top of the project and recognises it is a good risk, it will often be possible to provide extra funds to overcome these issues, but this will depend on the LTV that the lender is comfortable with and whether there is any value left in the security property.

For example, we were recently able to facilitate a loan at 82 per cent LTV for a broker and borrower we had worked with before. The borrower wanted to undertake a refurbishment of a residential property. Because they were known from previously successful loan projects, we were comfortable the improvements would bring down the LTV to 59 per cent at the end of the loan term.

This enabled the borrower to take advantage of an opportunity to increase the value of their property substantially, resulting in an offer for £225,000 above the initial purchase price.

Jonathan Sealey is chief executive of Hope Capital

Recommended

Bridging Watch: Reasons to be fearful? Not one

The stability of the sector is forever being questioned but most surveys don’t tell us much and the overall signs are positive It was good to see the return of the ex-Dragonfly team with their new lender, Octane Capital. It represents a confidence in the stability of the bridging market that is forever being questioned. […]

Bridging Watch: Market positive despite headwinds

As competition in the sector continues to grow, lenders should seize opportunities while resisting overconfidence Prime Minister Theresa May has officially served the Brexit divorce papers and we are in the ‘Phoney War’ stage. Despite posturing to the contrary, there is goodwill on both sides and, by and large, economic news has been positive. The […]

Thumbnail

Trust me, I’m a provider

By Craig Paterson, Underwriting and Claims Philosophy Manager, Royal London Hard-hitting headlines “Dying mother of two is refused life insurance payout.”1 “What a way to treat a dying man: Grandfather refused life insurance claim.”2 “A widow betrayed by a life insurance company.”3 With headlines like these, it’s no wonder some consumers don’t trust providers. Trust […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
Comments
  • Post a comment
  • Carl McGovern 30th June 2017 at 1:56 pm

    What I am waiting for is a lender who is prepared to Mortgage a property, despite it being owned for less than six months. The bridging route as described above is an excellent way of providing the short term finance for this. Bridging however will prove to be expensive in the long term and if a scheme can be finished 2-3 months after completion, the fun can then begin. If the owners decides to sell, what he will find is any prospective purchaser, won’t be able to obtain a traditional Mortgage, as the current owners has owned it for less than 6 months. In addition to this, if the owner decides to let the property, he will also find the same problem, trying to go to the open market for a BTL Mortgage. He is therefore either stuck with the bridging finance for a few further months, or he has to take a BTL Mortgage, if available with the lender he took the bridging finance with. Surely a lender can move to alleviate this problem.