View more on these topics

Comment: Rental surgery required


Many are asking if the Government’s actions will help people onto the ladder, because affordability is yet to be addressed

Earlier this year a sea of change hit the buy-to-let market. The announcement on tax relief changes, followed by new stamp duty levels and finally the PRA consultation paper on underwriting standards for buy-to-let mortgages, signalled the Government’s intention to halt the rise of the private rented sector at the expense of owner occupation.

Now the waves have settled, many are questioning whether this action will really help borrowers make it onto the housing ladder because the issue of affordability is yet to be addressed.

There is no guarantee that stifling the buy-to-let market will lead to an increase in owner occupation. Tougher regulation on lending means some people can afford only to rent, even if they wanted to buy, because they are unable to borrow enough to buy the properties that may reappear on the market.

In response to the raft of changes, lenders are altering their rental calculations. In a nutshell, they require landlords to receive more rent in relation to their mortgage payment, which could place an even greater burden on tenants.

Furthermore, mounting pressure on landlords is also a cause for concern for prospective first-time buyers. Increasing stamp duty on buy-to-let property while reducing the available tax relief could, as market forces dictate, lead to increased rental costs – eroding any hope of saving for a deposit.

Recent figures suggest the average rent across most of the UK in June was close to £773 a month and in London the average was £1,575. These prices represent a year-on-year increase of 3.5 per cent and 3.9 per cent respectively, according to figures from referencing firm Homelet.

Nevertheless, the stamp duty changes are substantial and could raise billions of pounds for the Government over the next few years. How it chooses to distribute this excess capital will undoubtedly be watched closely by landlords, lenders and first-time buyers in the years to come.

Karen Hedges is mortgage manager at First Complete



Fewer than half of lenders pass on rate cut to SVR borrowers

Fewer than half of lenders have failed to pass on the cut in the Bank of England base rate to borrowers on Standard Variable Rates, new figures show. Analysis by, the price comparison website, found that a number of lenders also hiked the price of variable rates on offer to new borrowers in anticipation […]


Private rental demand cooling: BM Solutions

Demand from UK residential renters is flattening off, according to research from BM Solutions. The research shows that 45 per cent of landlords saw no change in demand from tenants in the second quarter compared to the first. Meanwhile, London was the only area of the UK to see a fall in demand. More than […]


Santander raises rates on new tracker deals

Santander has increased the rates on new tracker deals by up to 0.2 per cent and launched a range of new fixed rate products that are up to 0.25 per cent lower than previous deals. Selected buy-to-let deals have also been reduced. The new deals are as follows: Fixed Rate 60 per cent LTV 10 […]

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles at

Pension freedom: wish you were here?

Out there lies a warm ocean of desert islands, sun, sand and palm trees, where individuals can choose how and when to tax-efficiently access their pension fund and realise the retirement dreams they have worked so hard for.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up
  • Post a comment
  • Corby Macdonald 10th September 2016 at 10:02 am

    This article sums up what is happening, but, to be honest, the whole reality and its not “could” increase the rental burden of tenants “It will” increase the burden of tenants, which will lead to arrears, which will lead to more problems within the sector. I am not saying there doesn’t need to be control, but, when fundamentally the changes will hit the people at the bottom, then its wrong! Like most changes at the moment, it seems to come from ideas from the “top” of the foodchain, not from the people on the ground floor dealing with the actual clients, asking them for their opinions. All I see is the loss of the smaller landlord, that was looking for an alternate investment, which I don’t think was the original plan. Whether it will bring more properties to the market, is to be seen, but, again it fails to deal with changing needs of the population today, where a lot of youngsters are content to rent. There are more pressing problems in the housing and mortgage market that needs attention, before the Buy to Let market