MMR: Trade bodies welcome amended proposals

Industry trade bodies have broadly welcomed the final consultation paper of the Mortgage Market Review, claiming the regulator has listened to their feedback and amended its proposals accordingly.

The Association of Mortgage Intermediaries says it is glad the Financial Services Authority has taken on board a number of its recommendations.

Robert Sinclair, director of AMI, says he is particularly pleased with the requirement for advice for all interactive sales, as this will provide significant benefits for consumers.

He says: “Buying a house is a substantial financial undertaking, and we have long argued that providing consumers with expert advice is a process that cannot be left to chance.

“The MMR’s proposals will ensure many more consumers are given the support and guidance they need to make better and more informed decisions.”

Sinclair says he is also pleased the FSA has recognised the importance of creating a level playing field for lenders and intermediaries in terms of qualifications and determining product suitability.

He adds: “The only area we consider needs further work is on the transitional arrangements, where the work to assist mortgage and property prisoners might benefit from further development.”

Meanwhile the Council of Mortgages Lenders describes the latest proposals as far more workable and appropriate than those contained in previous consultation papers.

It says it had previously been extremely concerned that the earlier proposals would have had a detrimental effect on consumers and lenders, but that the FSA has listened to those concerns.

Paul Smee, director-general of the CML, says: “Lending needs to be responsible and done in a way which protects consumers. Rules need to be practical and avoid unintended consequences.

“Whilst there is much detail to be pored over, the FSA’s new proposals seem to strike broadly the right balance.”

Paul Broadhead, head of mortgage policy at the Building Societies Association, adds that the new proposals appear to represent a welcome shift in policy from the FSA.

He says: “No-one is looking for a regime that permits lax lending practices, but the original proposals were in danger of locking credit-worthy borrowers out of the market or imprisoning those with immaculate payment records, but non-standard profiles, in their current homes and loans.  

“This seems to have been avoided which is good news for the self-employed, those in existing self-certified mortgages and people with negative equity.  

“The new regulations appear to have struck a reasonable balance between allowing lenders flexibility when assessing affordability, whilst maintaining a sensible level of consumer protection.”

Peter Williams, executive director of the Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association, says overall, the MMR announcement shows many positive signs of the FSA listening and responding to the industry.

He says: “The new regime is not due until 2013 and there is the issue of transitional treatments but we have another round of consultation and a longish lead time to implementation to deal with this. We hope the momentum built up and the approach adopted by the FSA is not lost as we move towards the new arrangements for regulation.

“Of more immediate concern for IMLA, as we work through the proposals, are questions around the boundaries of some of these issues i.e. what is reasonable, who should be included and who might be defined as vulnerable. We also note that the proposals will have a rolling impact as the market strengthens.

“In that regard, I see the proposals as modestly reducing who can get mortgages now and when the market picks up these belts tighten further. It is clear this will impact most heavily on non-prime with a major contraction of what that market might do if the market overall becomes more buoyant.

’Although the proposals might suggest fewer arrears and repossession cases going forward, it does seem that options for those in difficulty will narrow and this might change the balance between arrears and repossession cases as we move into a downturn.”

If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Mortgage Strategy and

Readers' comments (6)

  • Presumably the AMI are also pleased with the expected increase in direct only sales and a further reduction in whole of market mortgage brokers. Well done AMI for supporting us so well.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can someome please explain how the price of your house effects your ability to afford your mortgage payments? The chairman of the F.S.A. seems to think it does but I, as a lowly mortgage broker cant see it! I agree with the comments from Bobby about A.M.I., will they still think it's a good idea when more brokers go to the wall and their fee income takes a nose dive?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I see a different future, a future where lenders cut their costs in terms of staff and embrace the intermediary market.

    The net savvy buyer will keep doing what he/she does, but as soon as any contact is required the adivice process starts.

    From what I can see of the proposals the smart money will be forging closer relationships with professional advisors, 'outsourcing' advice has got to be the only solution for lenders, that or TnC up your sales force to give advice then go work for someone else anyway??

    MMR will raise the standard of intermediary (mortgage) three fold, lenders can tap into this at cost and plough their money into their own bonuses eer, of course I mean competitive products.

    Its about time non-advised sales have been reviewed, in all I dont think I have ever dealt with a client that truely knows whats right for them, everyone needs advice and it should be accessible at the highest quality level.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I refer to the negative interpretation of Roberts (AMI) comments by Bobby! I see this as an opportunity to ensure advice is driven via Brokers and lenders will need to compete more for business. I hope Robert was intending to reflect this. It is interesting to hear the words "irresponsible borrowing" in the media broadcasts today,how about lending?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Talk about After the Lord Mayor's Show!? Most of the proposals have already been in force for the last eighteen months. Lending into Retirement, Self-Certs, Interest Only and Affordability are already dealt with. Nothing new here...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with Anon 5.23 19 Dec, what FSA seem to be suggesting is making considered sensible decisions when dealing with lending requests. Well that's radical isn't it?! Of course to the Ivory Tower brigade it probably does seem that way, the rest of us have been doing it for years and the message does seem to have evn got through to some lenders! Once again the FSA does what it is best at, spending our money on pointless exercises that will enable them to spend even more of our money.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Do you recommend fast-track to customers?

Current Issue

petitions
debate
Define Advice