Firms waited 21 weeks to get FSA authorisation in Q2
The length of time it takes for a firm to get authorised by the Financial Services Authority increased 8% in Q2 to 21.1 weeks from 19.5 weeks in Q1, says City law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP.

According to RPC, authorisations took an average of 7.9 weeks before the credit crunch started in 2007, so businesses now have to wait 167% longer before the FSA agrees to authorise them.
Jonathan Davies, regulatory partner at RPC, says: “The question in my mind is whether the FSA is taking longer to authorise firms because it is being more rigorous or whether it is because it is haemorrhaging its more experienced staff and cannot keep up with the workload.
“If it is that they are being more rigorous, what does that say about the FSA’s approach to authorisation just a year ago?
“If, on the other hand, the FSA lacks the resources to cope effectively with requests for authorisation then that will raise major concerns in the financial services sector.”
RPC says that the number of applications to the FSA for corporate authorisation to conduct regulated business has fallen substantially since the credit crunch.
The FSA received 1,375 authorisation applications between April 1 2008 and March 31 2009 at the height of the credit crunch, 37% less than at the height of the boom when it received 2,193 applications in 2006-7.
Davies adds: “Fewer financial service businesses have been trying to enter the market since the credit crunch started so it is even more astonishing that FSA authorisations are taking so long.
“These delays risk reducing competition and harming the City’s international competitiveness. Is the legacy of the credit crunch really going to be that consumers suffer because of a lack of competition between financial service providers?”
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Mortgage Strategy and Follow @mortgagestrat










Readers' comments (1)
henry evans | 11 Oct 2010 1:35 pm
why should the FSA rush such applications? They are no great respectors of either existing or new members. Hopefully their days are numbered anyway!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment