Firms that buy mortgage books must be FSA regulated
Mark Hoban, the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, has today announced a package of measures intended to enhance consumer protection in the mortgage market.
As part of the measures third party administrators and firms that buy mortgage books will now need to be regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
The government says there is evidence that a growing number of mortgage lenders are selling their mortgage books, either to limit losses or raise funds, or because they want to exit the UK market.
It says the buyers in these cases are often hedge funds and private equity firms, attracted by the chance to purchase assets at a significant discount.
The government says it has evidence that some borrowers may be treated unfairly because their mortgage has been sold on to an unregulated firm as part of a mortgage book sale, a decision over which they had no choice or control.
The government has identified in the market for the onward sale of mortgage books risks of negative externalities impacting on mortgage borrowers.
Its intention is to mitigate the risks of market failure in order to achieve a fair, stable and efficient market in mortgages.
It says this would be achieved by ensuring that the firm which interacts with the mortgage holder, for example by notifying them of changes in interest rates or payments due under the contract, must be regulated by the FSA.
This could be either the purchaser of the mortgage book or a third party administrator appointed by them.
The measures also include the transfer of the regulation of new and existing second charge residential mortgages from the Office of Fair Trading to the Financial Services Authority and the extension of the current regulation of the sale and rent back market to all providers.
Paul Broadhead, head of mortgage policy at the Building Societies Association, says: “In principle the measures announced by the government today are sensible. Any tightening of the underwriting criteria of first charge mortgages, through rules imposed by the FSA, has the potential to drive customers to other forms of credit, such as second charge mortgages. These loans are often more expensive and are subject to a different regulatory structure.
“Bringing second charges mortgages under the FSA remit will help ensure that there is consistency in regulation and could make it simpler for consumers.
“The BSA is also supportive of the proposed regulation of firms that purchase mortgage books and the expansion of sale and rent back criteria, to prevent consumer detriment in this market.”
But he says the the HM Treasury announcement today adds to the weight of regulatory proposals the FSA needs to consider.
He adds: “As we have consistently stated, it remains vital that the FSA assess in detail the cumulative impact of all the proposals to prior to pressing ahead with implementation, particularly to ensure that the revised regulations facilitate the desired outcomes for UK consumers.”
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Mortgage Strategy and Follow @mortgagestrat










Readers' comments (6)
Anonymous | 26 Jan 2011 10:47 am
Quick, somebody shut that stable door before all the horses ...............oh dear, too late.
What a bunch of clowns. How many mortgages have been sold on in the last 2 years. Typical FSA, reactive not proactive.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Mike Fitzgerald | 26 Jan 2011 10:55 am
Its right that the FSA should regulate the companies that buy mortgage books.However this should have been done 3 years ago and once again the FSA have reacted too late.
Also the companies that buy mortgage portfolios may now be put off and this will make it harder for lenders to raise money and will help to restrict lending
Mike Fitzgerald-The EMBA Group Ltd
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Sarah Young | 26 Jan 2011 10:57 am
Whilst I also never miss an opportunity to rant at the FSA, your comments anon 10:47 are misplaced. The FSA never had the remit to regulate, the Government needed to give that, so its not the FSA shutting the door, its the Government, so lets be factual when having a rant please!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Dave | 26 Jan 2011 12:44 pm
However's remit it was it is about time that lenders were prevented from selling their books to non lending institutions. This practise is extremely unfair to their borrowers who are effectively locked in to their reversionary rates unless they re-mortgage to another lender.
Those with plenty of equity can move to another provider quite easily but those who borrowed 85% and above three years ago may be locked in as they may not have any equity in their property. The same can be said of those lenders who are no longer lending. Take TMB for example, we have many clients who have Buy to Let mortgages with them and they are effectively in the same preverbial boat.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Leslie Squires | 26 Jan 2011 2:16 pm
I would have thought that trading securities on the secondary markets was very much a concern for the FSA. We have just experienced a major credit crunch involving the trading of asset based securities. So Sarah you will have to forgive me if I beg to differ.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
QuoMan | 27 Jan 2011 9:09 am
Sarah Young | 26 Jan 2011 10:57 am
Well said, a bit of common sense at last. Until FSMA is amended, FSA (and their successors) will not have the power to regulate the acquisition of mortgage books.
The same applies to BTL and 2nd Charges.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment