Brokers claim Lloyds is exploiting trapped borrowers with SVR hike

Lloyds Banking Group has been accused of taking advantage of self-cert borrowers’ inability to remortgage by raising the SVRs for customers of its Bank of Scotland and The Mortgage Business subsidiaries.

Bank of Scotland and TMB, both closed to new business, have told some 175,000 customers that their SVRs are increasing from 4.84% to 4.95% on November 1.

A spokesman for Lloyds group says: “The 0.11% increase in rate equates to an average change of around £10 a month for customers. This reflects an increased cost of funding and the higher capital costs of operating these mortgages.

“The majority of borrowers with these brands have non-mainstream mortgages and 4.95% remains a competitive rate for such products.”

Ray Boulger, senior technical manager at John Charcol, says most TMB and Bank of Scotland borrowers will be on self-cert or buy-to-let deals, and those on the former will find it difficult to remortgage to a different lender.

He says: “Arguably, what Lloyds group is doing is taking advantage of a situation where a lot of its customers are unable to remortgage.

“A cynic would say this is an easy way of raising cash, but it is also understandable because funding costs are increasing for lenders as a result of the eurozone crisis.

“This flags up the risk to borrowers of being with a closed lender which has little incentive to remain competitive.”

One broker commenting on Mortgage Strategy Online says: “Both these brands are aware that self-cert clients sitting on an SVR are unable to remortgage elsewhere, so they are simply bumping up profits.”

A Lloyds group spokesman says the bank understands why concerns have been raised about self-cert borrowers’ ability to remortgage, but stresses that the change has been made because costs have increased more for non-mainstream providers.

If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Mortgage Strategy and

Readers' comments (3)

  • Sounds fair enough to me, if its costing more for Lloyds to finance those type of borrowings then they have to put up the rates. That some Self Cert' buyers were a bit optimistic about their earnings is their problem. Lloyds is here to make money at the end of the day and an extra tenner is hardly a lot.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not ethical at all, after all they ownd by Tax payers,

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • To ya. You obviously care little for facts. Lloyds are not owned by tax payers, the UK Government has a minority holding. They are a PLC like any other with a duty to look after the interests of its shareholders.
    And anyway what is unethical about passing on the appropriate cost of risk to customers carrying that risk. Thats how it always should be done. I for one do not wish to subsidise self cert customers.
    It's really about time some people grew up and stopped ranting about unjustified and non sensical criticism of everything the banks do. Spend some time learning about how the financial systems work so you can make some informed criticsm when its deserved.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Do you agree that advisers are the main barrier to achieving higher protection sales?

Current Issue

Mortgage Strategy 15 May 2013

fsa_logo
petitions
debate
Define Advice