Underwriting can sort interest-only wheat from chaff

Interest-only should be allowed subject to the deal making sense to the lender.

To impose a blanket ban or set rigid criteria is a step too far, although inheritance should not be allowed as a repayment vehicle.

What if the borrower dies before their parents without adequate life insurance, or the parents die unexpectedly with a mortgage of their own requiring repayment?

So what is a valid vehicle?

As we have seen in the past, endowments are not a guaranteed way to repay. Sale of the property is one way provided it is plausible for it to be sold on the first day, leaving sufficient equity to purchase a suitable smaller property.

For example, a four-bedroom detached house could be sold leaving enough for a one-bedroom flat. Clients looking to buy a four-bedroom detached property would most likely have children at home and could expect to sell in 25 years time and move to a flat.

Interest-only became acceptable to lenders without proper evaluation of repayment vehicles as loans were sold on and became somebody else’s problem.

Interest-only is a great way for home owners to start out, particularly those with a career progression mapped out such as doctors, accountants and solicitors.

It works just as well for first-time buyers on a tight budget, provided the issue of a suitable repayment plan is addressed early.

So once again a lender takes a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

The answer is simple - proper underwriters are required with interest-only cases.

NAME AND ADDRESS SUPPLIED

If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Mortgage Strategy and

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Do you recommend fast-track to customers?

Current Issue

petitions
debate
Define Advice