Cable attacks capitalism and financial sector
Business secretary Vince Cable has launched a scathing attack on capitalism and the UK financial sector.

Speaking at the Liberal Democrat conference in Liverpool, Cable slammed the “murky world of corporate behaviour” and insisted that the government does not have a laissez-faire economic agenda.
He says: “Markets are often irrational or rigged. So I am shining a harsh light into the murky world of corporate behaviour.
“Why should good companies be destroyed by short term investors looking for a speculative killing, while their accomplices in the City make fat fees? Why do directors sometimes forget their wider duties when a cheque is waved before them?
Cabel adds that “spivs and gamblers” in the City and says they have done more damage to the UK economy than trade unions.
He adds: “Capitalism takes no prisoners and kills competition where it can, as Adam Smith explained over 200 years ago.
“I want to protect consumers and keep prices down and provide a level playing field for small business, so we must be vigilant right across the economy - whether in the old industries of economies textbooks or the newer privatised utilities and cosy magic circles in auditing, law or investment banking. Competition is central to my pro market, pro business, agenda.”
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Mortgage Strategy and Follow @mortgagestrat










Readers' comments (4)
Bobby | 22 Sep 2010 4:28 pm
" provide a level playing field for small business "
Unless your a mortgage broker, eh Vince.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Mike | 22 Sep 2010 4:47 pm
Perhaps Vince should investigate the Lloyds Banking Group takeover of HBOS. That seemed a pretty "murky" deal.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 22 Sep 2010 4:54 pm
Does Vince Cable live in the real World or is he going senile?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 23 Sep 2010 8:58 am
"Does Vince Cable live in the real World or is he going senile?"
Unfortnately the answer is both.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment