Beware of Stamp Duty avoidance schemes, says law firm

Law firm Boodle Hatfield says it is seeing a growing number of people turning to schemes that offer ways to avoid paying Stamp Duty.

It says HMRC is taking an increasingly dim view of such schemes being offered, usually via the internet.

The firm says an increasing number of wealthy individuals are buying property through companies, often located offshore, to avoid paying Stamp Duty, which it says could be fuelled by the increase earlier in the year of the Stamp Duty rate to 5% on properties valued over £1m.

Ian Montgomery, a solicitor specialising in tax at Boodle Hatfield, says: “There is a growing belief that it is possible to avoid paying Stamp Duty on the purchase of a property or land, but unless particularly aggressive tax planning is undertaken that is just not the case.

“It is a common misconception that it is possible to purchase a property using a company and avoid Stamp Duty.

“When a property is purchased through a company, whether based offshore or in the UK, it pays the same rate of Stamp Duty as if it where an individual. Stamp Duty may be avoided by future purchasers when the company decides to sell the property. This is done by the owner selling shares in the company rather than the property itself, but Stamp Duty will be paid on the initial purchase.”

Stamp Duty on the purchase of shares stands at 0.5%, rather than the four or 5% on property. If the company is based offshore the purchase of shares is exempt from Stamp Duty entirely.

On a residential property valued at £2m, the purchaser could save £90,000 from purchasing the shares in a UK company holding the property as opposed to purchasing the property direct.

Montgomery adds: “The seller may also be able to negotiate a higher purchase price for the shares so that the Stamp Duty saving is basically split between the parties,”

He says it is possible however to reduce exposure to Stamp Duty by taking advantage of the one or more of the reliefs and/or exemptions contained within the Stamp Duty rules.

He adds: “One such example is to reduce the purchase price of a property subject to Stamp Duty by attributing part of the purchase price to chattels and any other assets not liable to Stamp Duty, as long as the amount attributed to these assets does not exceed their real value.”

It says there are other more aggressive ways of actively avoiding Stamp Duty being promoted, often via the internet, but HMRC is actively targeting such schemes.

Montgomery adds: “Such schemes can be considered very aggressive tax planning and HMRC is taking an increasingly dim view and is prepared to challenge them through the Tax Tribunal. They often rely on HMRC not chasing individuals who engage in them, and this is a very risky strategy. Our advice would always be to steer clear of such schemes.”

If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Mortgage Strategy and

Readers' comments (8)

  • Clearly this Law Firm knows little of the schemes as they have not mentioned the actual method used. SDLT is avoidable by using schemes and these are notified to HMRC so whether they take a "dim view" or otherwise is irrelevant.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • At the end of the day if there is a way to avoid paying excessive ridiculous unncessary tax charges using your own heard earned money you have already paid tax and insurance once already, I'm not surprised peope are turning to these schemes. I wouldn't mind if we got a good service from the people it funds but we don't. We deserve the refund! Start making things fair to everyone and we are less likely to try ways to avoid paying it!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If it's such a problem, why are they not pushing for legislation to simplify the tax system and close this loophole, and instead relying on scare tactics to discourage people using the schemes? This seems an endeavour as worthy as trying to kick water uphill.

    Self interest maybe? Simplify the tax law, these avoidance methods would not be used, and fewer civil servants will be needed in HMRC as a result. I think I just answered my own question!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • stamp duty!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I already have a "dim view" of HMRC, and it's not stopped their dodgy and inaccurate practices. So if they have the same of me we can stare at each other across the gloom.
    Be sure that if they can stop it they will, if they can't it's legal.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As the schemes have to be disclosed under DOTAS they are likely to be legislated against in the next budget. Also, if you purchase a house through a company and occupy it as your residence, do you get capital gains tax principal residence relief?? Are you walking out of one tax and into another?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is Ian Montgomery realy a stamp taxes expert?

    According to Boodle Hatfield's website, he only has 3 years PQE and is not listed as a solictor on the Law Society website.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • From the SRA website:

    "It is a criminal offence for someone to call themselves a solicitor or act as a solicitor if they are not on the roll of solicitors. We call these people "bogus solicitors" and we may prosecute them"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Do you recommend fast-track to customers?

Current Issue

petitions
debate
Define Advice