14-day cooling-off period for mortgages back on the cards
European regulatory powers are once again calling for a 14-day cooling-off period for mortgages.

The idea was originally proposed in the first draft of the European Mortgage Directive but was later scrapped, but it is now back on the cards.
The European Commission announced its proposals for the mortgage market in March this year.
The next stage in the process was for two separate committees of the European parliament – one with responsibility for economic and monetary affairs (ECON) and the other overseeing internal markets and consumer protection (IMCO) – to report their reactions to the proposals.
Each committee nominated a rapporteur to draft the report expressing its views.
The IMCO report is not expected until September, but the report from ECON – with Sanchez Presedo as the rapporteur – appeared at the end of last month and the Council of Mortgage Lenders say the proposals would constitute a radical re-working of the directive.
The report proposes:
- The introduction of a ’cooling-off’ period for borrowers of at least 14 working days after a mortgage offer has been made.
- Compensation for consumers if credit is rejected because a reference agency supplies an inaccurate report.
- The right for borrowers to make overpayments without penalty, and for them to be able to draw down in the future any overpayments they have made; and a ban on arrears charges if payment problems arise that are beyond the control of the borrower.
In its latest issue of News & Views, the CML says the ECON report potentially represents a significant move away from the balanced approach to responsibilities for both lenders and borrowers envisaged in earlier plans for the directive.
It says: “Instead, it proposes a range of measures, many of which, taken at face value, seek to offer total protection for consumers. But there is little apparent acknowledgement of the potentially damaging impact the proposals could have on lenders – and ultimately the wider mortgage market and therefore on consumers, too.”
The report also proposes to:
- Apply the directive to the commercial funding of property developers, as well as transactions financed by mortgages – even though commercial loans are offered on a completely different basis to residential lending.
- Require member states to regulate how lenders and credit intermediaries are paid, with rules to prevent financial rewards linked to sales of individual products or targets.
- Prevent both automated underwriting as a substitute for expert risk assessment, and scoring based either solely on credit history or from external sources.
- Publish prudential requirements in each member state, including ratios for loan-to-value, loan-to-income, debt-to-income and loan-to-asset, with prudential requirements for the overall mortgage portfolio in each of these categories.
- Introduce requirements for “special credit risk agreements,” including foreign currency loans, mortgages where there could be significant variation in interest payments, and credit agreements where the return of the property is sufficient to repay the loan.
The CML adds: “We believe that the ECON report takes proposals for European regulation in an unexpected direction, which is inappropriate to the needs of consumers and firms that continue to operate essentially in separate markets.
“As we move into the autumn, we will be working with lenders and other interested parties – in the UK and Europe – to seek to ensure that European regulatory proposals are appropriate to the needs of firms and consumers in different countries. We will also be arguing that any new measures should be proportionate and justified by cost-benefit and impact analysis.”
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Mortgage Strategy and Follow @mortgagestrat










Readers' comments (9)
Jonathan Hammond | 10 Aug 2011 3:18 pm
To Prevent both automated underwriting as a substitute for expert risk assessment, and scoring based either solely on credit history or from external sources. It's about time! As are all the other proposals.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
EU Ruling - Get a grip on life | 10 Aug 2011 3:26 pm
The introduction of a ’cooling-off’ period for borrowers of at least 14 working days after a mortgage offer has been made.
How long is the time from offer stage to completion ?????????????
Compensation for consumers if credit is rejected because a reference agency supplies an inaccurate report.
WHY ? People should check their own credit reports
The right for borrowers to make overpayments without penalty, and for them to be able to draw down in the future any overpayments they have made; and a ban on arrears charges if payment problems arise that are beyond the control of the borrower.
Make every one have a Interest Only Offset Mortgage ??????????????
Maybe you should consider a 14 days Nil cost post completion move back out, if you not happy with your purchase.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
John Crisp | 10 Aug 2011 3:34 pm
Where have I been last 15 yrs. Lawyers would have a seizure if they had to complete in 14 days.
Who woke dopey up........
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 10 Aug 2011 3:57 pm
14 days could lose someone the property in certain circumstances, offers are not instant, surely the 14 days cooling off should be from the issue of a lender generated KFI,here is another example of meddling Eurocrats interfering again.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
YesAdam | 10 Aug 2011 4:20 pm
We already have a cooling off period - its called a Solicitor they take ages to do searches and such.
Sorry EU but mortgage brokers in office are laughing at you.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Andy Wilson | 10 Aug 2011 4:32 pm
A 14 day cooling off period wouldn't be needed if we continue with the Keyfacts illustrations. The mortgage offer only repeats the details contained in the KFI. If the lender's own rule book was sent to the borrower when the application was acknowledged, they would have plenty of time to consider the offer carefully.
Any delays after offer could seriously delay some home completions where offers are urgently needed by solicitors to complete (some do work quickly believe it or not).
Are we seriously to suggest someone has been disadvantaged by receiving a KFI with all of the scheme details, only to then receive an offer which is in no way different?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 10 Aug 2011 4:32 pm
This wont come in.
If it does, we'll all be watching the rates shoot up.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Bill Wells | 10 Aug 2011 6:46 pm
More meddling by people who make up rules but have no clue as to their impact. 14 days cooling off - bloody ridiculous !
However, I'm totally in favour of holding to account Experian and the other credit reference agencies when they mess up - which happens far too frequently. And it shouldn't just be for mortgages - the ICO is totally useless in controlling the problem of false data being available to any tin-pot company and the poor 'victim' having to fight against a brick wall to clear his name.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 11 Aug 2011 8:09 am
The market for mortgages is pretty cold at the moment and is set to get considerably worse due to the world debt crisis which will adversely affect the financial institutions' ability to lend for house purchase.
Maybe it would be right time to call for it when mortgage lending gets back to normal levels.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment