Swift investigated by FSA over arrears handling
Swift Advances is being investigated by the Financial Services Authority over its handling of customers in arrears and has set aside £9.4m to cover a potential fine and other costs.

In its annual accounts for the year ending March 31 2010, the first and second charge mortgage lender says the group received formal notice of the FSA’s decision to commence an investigation into aspects of its arrears handling and lending practices on July 31 2009.
It says the group is co-operating fully with the on-going investigation.
Its accounts also show the group has identified an anomaly in its mortgage administration system in respect of the determination of the amount due by some customers for early settlement of their mortgage, which has resulted in customer detriment.
The group says it has resolved to undertake a redress programme for those FSA regulated mortgage customers and unregulated mortgage customers affected.
its accounts say: “As a result of the above the directors currently estimate that the group is likely to incur £9.4m of costs, comprising £1.4m in respect of costs already incurred and £8m in respect of further costs that could be incurred, relating to legal and professional costs, a potential fine and costs implementing any redress programme.”
The Essex based lender filed its accounts on December 9 2010 and it is not known whether the FSA has taken any action against the lender or intends to.
Swift Advances is also subject to a similar industry investigation being conducted by the Office of Fair Trading into the practices of lenders in the second charge mortgage market. Its accounts says it is also co-operating fully with this investigation.
It accounts say: “On November 10 2010 the OFT advised that it is minded to impose requirements under section 33A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 in relation to activities which are conducted under Swift Advances and Swift Securities Limited credit act licences.”
Swift Advances is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act in respect of second charge lending and Swift 1st is regulated by the FSA.
GMAC-RFC, Kensington Mortgages and Redstone Mortgages, have all been fined for arrears management failings and the FSA has revealed it is investing a further five firms.
When contacted by Mortgage Strategy Swift was unavailable for comment.
The FSA says it cannot comment on individual cases.
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Mortgage Strategy and Follow @mortgagestrat










Readers' comments (5)
LF | 4 Apr 2011 4:06 pm
Wanting to investigate myself being a receiver of these shocking day light robbery fees. £6K loan now owe £17K?!?!?!Look forward to hearing more.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 25 Aug 2011 11:16 am
I am at my wits end with Swift, had a £8,800 loan secured on the house, thought we had paid it up now they say we owe another £13,000+ cant afford a solicitor, just dont know what to do????????
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 2 Nov 2011 3:24 pm
how is it when bank rates go up payments go up but when bank rates fall payments stay the same they have totally ruined our lives.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 9 Dec 2011 7:55 am
pensioners had a loan 62.000 repaid 65.960 they still want 25.000 for extra interest, wont allow redemption at moment wont back down, have lawyer on to it we are 66 and 69 keep in poor health what chances do we have and what else can we do fla not interested they are on the side of swift even tho they have been fined for over charging customers.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 17 Apr 2012 0:13 am
I had a 2nd change by swift £30.000 payed £54.000 now they say I got to pay £48.600 to pay this off or there taking my house help please
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment