Chelsea and Yorkshire merger talks disappointing but unsurprising

Yorkshire Building Society has announced it is in “advanced talks” to takeover, sorry, merge with, Chelsea Building Society. This is not yet a done deal and the statement was no doubt rushed out as a result of a leak reported by Mark Kleinman, city editor of Sky News, who makes the important point that although the Financial Services Authority has, as one would expect, been kept informed of negotiations it has not forced the Chelsea into these discussions.

This news is disappointing as it reduces competition, but it is far from surprising. When Stuart Bernau was parachuted into Chelsea in July as chairman he instituted a strategic review saying he would look at all options for the society including possible mergers.

Chelsea’s problems stem from bad commercial lending, significant fraud in its buy-to-let book and a £55m exposure to the failed Icelandic banks.

Some £44.3m of this £55m was written off in the 2008 accounts, although £9m was written back in the first half of this year. I understand much of this exposure was in the form of a three-year term deposit with what was then a highly respected British bank, Singer & Friedlander. The fact that S&F was subsequently acquired by Kaupthing demonstrates the danger of placing medium to long term commercial deposits with even quality banks and potentially inhibits the FSA’s push to get banks and building societies to extend the average life of their deposits.

In its 2008 accounts Chelsea also wrote off £15.4m from the 2007 acquisition near the top of the market of BCS Loans and Mortgages Limited, previously known as Britannia Capital Securities, a second and first charge mortgage broker. The effect of all these write offs, including a £10.2m contribution to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, was that Chelsea reported a net after tax loss for 2008 of £29.2m.

Nevertheless, in its review of 2008, included in its 2008 accounts the mutual reported that it had, “total group capital in excess of £700m and members can be assured that we have more than adequate capital to sustain the business.”

As a result of a £41m provision against fraud on some buy-to-let lending made between 2006 and 2008 Chelsea reported a loss of £26m in the first half of this year.

But the losses reported for 2008 clearly did not worry depositors as Chelsea increased its savings balances by 5% to £10.06bn in the first half of 2009 and the number of savers by 6.7% to 606,000, no doubt comforted by the guarantee provided by FSCS.

Britannia’s merger with the Co-op left the Yorkshire as the second largest building society, with a Group Balance Sheet total of £23bn at the end of last year. This compares with Chelsea’s £13.56bn at the middle of 2009, which is just over £1m less than its end of year figure for 2008.

If the merger goes through the combined society will have assets in excess of £35bn, easily the second biggest society but way behind Nationwide’s £201bn. It will also improve the geographical coverage offered to the members of both societies. 

Readers' comments (4)

  • I cannot conceive of how this is a disappointing announcement.

    The rescue of a failing organisation by one with considerable strength is good for consumers and intermediaries who want to be able to place business with confidence. Those who believe that competition is about the number of organisations available to place business with rather than their quality are really not doing consumers any favours and have disappointingly short memories.

    Rob Hayes

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is great news!!!! at least now once YB take over the SVR will be at a fair rate rather than the RIP OFF rate the Chelsea have applied, when questioned Chelsea lie by saying its to protect their "savers" utter rubbish. Great, get it done quick.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Chelsea SVR will remain after the Yorkshire merger as they will keep two SVR's going to save a lot of money, certinaly a reason to complain if you are stuck on Chelsea's SVR currently as Yorkshire Building Society will be the the new company Chelsea's SVR should effectively cease... well unless they want to continue to rip customers off and save a bucket load of cash as I wonder how many customers with high LTV's are stuck on Chelsea's SVR??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • how can a society rip off it customers like this these are hard times we are going through ,now we are being legaly ripped off and cannot do a thing about it, i could of paid a few thousand ponds off my mortgage but yet again i have to line other peoples pockets while mine are empty

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Poll

Will Santander's criteria changes be a blow to your business?

Current Issue

Lending Zone
petitions
debate
Define Advice