Liam Byrne demonstrates his fiscal ignorance

In his speech yesterday Prime Minister David Cameron warned of “difficult decisions” on pay, pensions and benefits, set out the reasons for the “painful” cuts ahead and said that dealing with the deficit would be “unavoidably tough” and affect “our whole way of life”.

RAY_BOULGER.gif

In response shadow chief secretary to the Treasury Liam Byrne claimed that Labour had “stopped recession becoming depression” and that “the coalition has inherited an economy that is growing, borrowing which is falling.”

If the ex chief secretary to the Treasury thinks that he bequeathed to the new government an economy in which “borrowing is falling” that perhaps explains his contribution to leaving the economy in such  mess.

The truth is that borrowing is still rising at a frightening pace.

Perhaps Mr Byrne doesn’t understand that if borrowing was really falling the national debt would be reducing and the government wouldn’t have to make cuts which will affect “our whole way of life”.

Of course Mr Byrne may have confused “falling” with “the rate of increase is falling” and if he doesn’t understand the difference between the two it may help to explain why he also thought it was clever to leave a note for his successor saying “there’s no money left.”

Readers' comments (5)

  • here, here Ray

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Absolutely, "inherited an economy that is growing"! What a complete moron, thank God he's gone.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Do you think there'll come a time when the previous government stop believing it's own hype?

    I agree with Ray

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The total of personal debt has apparently reach £1.46 trillion! Does anyone know what it was when New Labour came to power?
    Not only have they sadd
    led the coutry with an unimaginable level of government debt but they allowed personal borrowing to continue out of control.

    What a legacy!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I doubt that I was the only one, but I had interpreted the comment "borrowing which is falling" as a reduction in the rate of borrowing, in the same way I take the CML's recent comments of "reduction / decline in lending" (when comparing lending from one month to the next) as a reduction / decline in the rate of lending, rather than a reduction in the total amount of monies lent.

    As to the Anon 3.10 comment blaming the last government for the high level of personal borrowings - banks and the financial services industry generally had a lot to do with this with aggressive marketing, self certification and lenient underwriting.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Advanced search

Related images

Poll

Will Santander's criteria changes be a blow to your business?

Current Issue

Lending Zone
petitions
debate
Define Advice