AMI, CML and BSA get behind Stamp Duty reform campaign
The Association of Mortgage Intermediaries, the Council of Mortgage Lenders and the Building Societies Association have all added their weight to a campaign to spur the government to modernize Stamp Duty.
The campaign, dubbed the 1808 Coalition, has been set up by the National Association of Estate Agents and Association of Residential Letting Agents.
It believes that Stamp Duty is an anachronistic tax which, in its current form, is preventing a recovery in the housing sector - it limits market flexibility, creates regional inequality and its slab structure unfairly distorts the housing market.
The 1808 coalition campaign to reform Stamp Duty is named after the year Stamp Duty was first extended to property sales in Great Britain.
According to The 1808 coalition, the government should abolish Stamp Duty outright, or implement one of the alternatives:
* Suspend Stamp Duty for the duration of the housing downturn, with a commitment to review the existing system
*Reform the system moving from the distorting ‘slab’ system to a more progressive ‘slice’ system or progressive system which, like other taxes, is index-linked to inflation
* Or raise the starting threshold for this tax well above the current £175,000 limit to ensure that as much is done as possible to assist first time buyers into the market.
The current Stamp Duty holiday for properties lower than £175,000 is due to expire at the start of 2010 but in a recent survey by the NAEA, 91%t of estate agents surveyed felt that it should be extended. 86% of those surveyed felt that the tax is unfair.
Mortgage Strategy has had its own long running campaign to reform the Land Tax called Step Up Stamp Duty. Over the years thousands of Mortgage Strategy readers have supported it.
In addition to AMI, NAEA, ARLA, BSA and the CML, other trade bodies to have given their support to the 1808 Coalition include the Home Builders Federation and the National Landlords Assocation.
Peter Bolton-King, Chief Executive of the NAEA, says: “With the Pre Budget Report due soon, now is the time for the government to take action.”
Ian Potter, Operations Manager of ARLA said: “Not only does Stamp Duty prevent those aspiring to own a home from doing so, it also impacts the whole property chain. For ARLA members, this means having to pay Stamp Duty on the bulk price of a portfolio, when individual buy-to-let investors pay a lower rate on the single unit price.”
Robert Sinclair, Director of the AMI, said: “It is rare that the breadth of our industry comes together with such consensus on an issue. But the current Stamp Duty regime is distorting the market to such an extent that we feel compelled to speak out. AMI is fully committed to supporting this industry campaign to reform the regime. We implore the government to not only listen but, to act in support of our request for change to this damaging tax.”
John Stewart, director of economic affairs at the HBF, says: “It is imperative that the first signs of market stabilisation that have emerged in recent months, and which have allowed home builders to begin tentatively opening new sites and expanding output and employment, are nurtured.
“The government’s stimulus measures for housing, including the raised stamp duty threshold, have played a significant part in this stabilisation and it is vital that they are not removed at this still fragile stage, either in total or in part.”
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Mortgage Strategy and Follow @mortgagestrat











Readers' comments (3)
Dale Knight | 16 Nov 2009 3:58 pm
The current stamp duty system is well dated. To have a jump from 1% to 3% at 250k is ridiculous and a more linar stamp duty would be more beneficial.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Frank Hadley | 17 Nov 2009 9:06 am
Doesn't anybody else think it unjust that an individual, a pension fund or life fund investing millions in shares pays stamp duty of around 0.5%-1% on a purchase when property of £250001 is taxed at 3%?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Neil Burton | 17 Nov 2009 11:04 am
Why not combine Stamp Duty bands with Council Tax bands??????
This would crete a steady incline as opposed to the current situation where, for example, a house priced between £250 -> £270K will not sell for more than £250K.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment