Sponsored by

Mark Carney axes employment link in forward guidance overhaul

  • Print
  • Comments (7)

Bank of England governor Mark Carney has changed how the Bank will use forward guidance to target spare capacity in the economy, just six months after first introducing the policy into the UK.

Speaking today, Carney declared forward guidance to have worked so far but reassured that interest rates would remain low “for some time to come”, despite unemployment recently falling close to its 7 per cent threshold limit.

The overhaul of forward guidance sees the direct link with employment dropped so the Bank can focus on a much wider range of indicators.

Presenting today’s Inflation Report the governor outlined “the next phase” of forward guidance, saying the Bank aims to see all spare capacity in the UK economy absorbed before it will lift the base rate and reduce quantitative easing.

“The MPC is for the first time today providing guidance that it is seeking to absorb all the spare capacity in the economy over the next two to three years,” Carney said. “That recognises that spare capacity is both wasteful and increases the risk that inflation will undershoot the target in the medium term.

”For a sustained and balanced recovery, the degree of stimulus will need to remain exceptional for some time.”

As part of this, the Monetary Policy Committee will now examine a range of indicators to guide the time of policy decisions, rather than watching the headline unemployment rate. This will see the Bank publish forecasts of 18 more economic indicators for the first time.

As well as unemployment, the MPC will monitor factors such as participation in the labour market, average hours worked and the extent of involuntary part-time working, surveys of spare capacity in companies, labour productivity and wages.

Carney also said the base rate will only rise gradually “if and when the time comes that the economy can sustain higher interest rates”. These limited increases are to protect against the “many” headwinds that threaten to hold back the economy.

In addition, the governor said the Bank will maintain its current QE programme until the first rise in the base rate.

Carney concluded: “The bank rate may need to stay at low levels for some time to come. The first phase of guidance gave businesses confidence that bank rate would not be raised at least until jobs, incomes and spending were growing at sustainable rates.

“As guidance evolves, that remains the case: the MPC will not take risks with the recovery.”

In August, the governor said the Bank would not consider lifting interest rates until the UK’s unemployment rate fell to 7 per cent, as long as inflation did not get out of hand and no threats to financial stability emerged.

At the time, the unemployment rate stood at 7.8 per cent and the Bank expected median unemployment to be 7.3 per cent over the next three years. However, it has since fallen to just 7.1 per cent.

During the recent World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Carney said he would consider a wide range of options for updating forward guidance policy in light of the unemployment rate being close to the threshold limit sooner than expected.

Old Mutual Strategic Bond fund manager Stewart Cowley says: “Setting strict economic targets for interest policy is like playing soccer with a rugby ball – it’s too imprecise and no matter your intentions it will bounce off course. Unemployment numbers don’t take into account the breadth of human experience and is too coarse a measure to be useful for policy setting.

“In that case it isn’t surprising that the BOE abandons strict numerical targeting. What a capitalist economy like we have in the UK needs is a new and vigorous credit cycle built on a stable banking system and a working population that has the confidence and self-assurance to borrow.”

  • Print
  • Comments (7)

Daily Email Updates

If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest breaking news and analysis for your industry from Mortgage Strategy.

Readers' comments (7)

  • I suspect he's sussed that unemployment isn't actually falling as such, but the Tories are simply finding new ways of removing people from the figures. (Zero hour contracts, making people work for free, etc).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sam De Zoysa

    Nice problem to have. Stability rather than guidance is far more productive for business than some moveable feast. Certainty of business rates, Employers NI and other job sapping taxes and rules wouldn't go amiss.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Its called backtracking Mark.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Harry Katz

    What make it so complex? Inflation up - rates up. QED.

    The best businesses don't borrow - they use their own money. The poor business can't borrow. The big businesses do what they please as they have the banks by the short and curlies. So all we have left is what it would do to the consumer and mortgage holder. In this case they are going to be zapped anyway with higher Council Tax, food prices and AE.

    The Government is hell bent on soaking the rich - who can actually afford to spend and support the economy.

    Basically ducks need to be put in a row. Reduce tax, put up interest rates and those who have savings (the majority) will feel better off and spend money in the shops on which our daft economy relies.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Marty

    @ Harry K 1.19pm. All economies totally depend on consumer spending because without that all businesses would collapse. Without the end consumers, retail would not exist. Without retail whole sale would not be there and so on.......... all suppliers would go out of business because they would end up with no customers that they could sell their products to. In turn the suppliers suppliers would do likewise etc etc etc. Without consumer spending (albeit spending within budget) it all goes horribly wrong - all over the world and we end up back in caves, killing for our own survival. It is the way the whole world works Harry so I guess you may know that I totally disagree with your last para above.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Harry Katz

    Well Marty I see that in essence we actually agree. Your said "albeit spending within budget". I said

    " those who have savings.....spend money in the shops " I would have thought that is substantially the same thing. I was careless and lazy. What I implied was that our economy relies on those spending money they don't have. If that isn't daft then I must me on a different planet.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Marty

    @ Harry -Point taken and yes we then agree. Keep blogging

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say Edit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment


How big do you think brokers' share of the market will be in a year's time?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs